Conservation of Energy when lifting a box up off the floor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy when lifting a box, highlighting the confusion between work done and energy conservation principles. It clarifies that the work-energy theorem states the total work done on an object equals the change in its kinetic energy, rather than mechanical energy being conserved. When a force greater than gravity lifts the box, the work done by the force and gravity must be accounted for separately. The equation derived shows that the sum of changes in kinetic and potential energy is not constant, indicating energy is not conserved in this scenario. Ultimately, the error lies in misapplying conservation principles in a situation where they do not apply.
nav888
Messages
38
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Writing a conservation of energy statement
Relevant Equations
W = mgh
E = 1/2 mv^2
So, I cannot for the life of me write a conservation of energy statement, when an object is lifted up by a force. So in my example there is a box on the floor with v = 0, and then a force of magnitude F, where F > mg, acts on the ball, now the net force is F-mg, and hence the work done is (F - mg) h where h is the vertical height, Now I thought that the work done is equal to the energy of the ball, and hence (F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.
But this isnt correct, could someone please help explain?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please read your post and correct ...
 
BvU said:
Please read your post and correct ...
? I have come here for help I cannot correct my work or I would not ask for help? Sorry
 
@nav888 I hope I understood your problem correctly.
##W_{total}=\Delta K=\frac 1 2 m(v^2_f-v^2_i)##
In your example ##v_i=0## so the total work is : ##W_{total}=\frac 1 2 mv^2_f##
nav888 said:
(F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.
If there is no air resistance and only these 2 forces are acting on the object you can calculate total work easily:
##W_{total}=F_{net}dcos\theta=(F-mg)h=\frac 1 2 mv^2_f##

Your answer has an extra mgh:
(F - mg) h = 1/2mv^2 + mgh.

Edit: Note that The work-energy theorem states that the total work done on an object equals the change in its kinetic energy.
 
What you need is the work-energy theorem because mechanical energy (kinetic plus potential) is not conserved. The work-energy theorem says that the sum of the works done by all the forces is equal to the change in kinetic energy. If (constant) external force ##F## lifts the mass to height ##h## from rest, there are two forces doing work on the mass, gravity and ##F##. So you write
##W_g=-mgh## (negative work because the displacement and the force are in opposite directions)
##W_F=Fh## (positive work because the displacement and the force are in the same direction)
##W_{total}=W_g+W_F=Fh-mgh##
Thus, by the work-energy theorem $$\Delta K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2=Fh-mgh.$$Now the change in potential energy is ##\Delta U = mgh.## If you move that to the other side of the equation and change sign, you get $$\Delta K+\Delta U=Fh.$$ The above equation says that the sum of the changes in kinetic plus potential energy changes, as the mass is lifted, is not constant. If mechanical energy were conserved, then the sum of the two changes must be zero.

So you cannot, for the life of you, write an energy conservation equation simply because you chose a situation where energy is not conserved.
 
Last edited:
Another way of looking at it:
Posts #4 and #5 correctly analyse it in terms of the work done on the mass.
Alternatively, consider the work done by the force on the mass/Earth system. The gained potential energy is internal energy of that system:
##Fh=\frac 12mv^2+mgh##.
So your error can be thought of as mixing up the two views.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top