Conservation of Momentum and linear momentum

AI Thread Summary
Linear momentum is conserved in closed systems, but certain scenarios can lead to confusion about conservation principles. The discussion revolves around a homework question asking which situation does not conserve linear momentum, with various examples provided. Participants highlight that momentum conservation depends on the system being analyzed, emphasizing that while individual objects may not conserve momentum, the overall system often does. The question's wording is criticized for being unclear, particularly regarding the scenarios involving lightning and outer space. Ultimately, understanding the context of the system is crucial for determining momentum conservation.
x0ji11y
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In which one of the following situations is linear momentum not conserved?
A) A bomb suspended by a string explodes into one hundred fragments.
B) A bowling ball collides with ten pins.
C) A golf ball is struck by a club.
D) An astronaut floating in space throws a hammer away and subsequently moves in the opposite direction.
E) A tree limb is struck by lightning and falls to the ground.

Homework Equations



Momentum=mass(velocity)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea... I thought momentum was always conserved? Can someone help explain this please? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know how to compute the momentum in the lightning bolt? (prolly not yet)
can you figure out a way to measure the Earth's speed moving up to meet the branch?
(Nobel prize if you do it)
 
Say you are standing on the the ground. You're at rest, so your momentum is zero. If you now jump, you rise through the air, and your momentum is no longer zero. Clearly, your momentum isn't conserved. However, look at the system consisting of you and the Earth. When you jump up, the Earth recoils, and the momentum of the system as a whole is conserved. Two cars colliding is another example. The momentum of an individual car is obviously not conserved, but the momentum of the two-car system is conserved. So the question of whether momentum is conserved or not depends on what you're talking about, on what is included in the system.
 
I think the question is faulty.We may not be able to prove by experiment that momentum is conserved in some of the situations described but theory based on other experiments suggests that within closed systems momentum is always conserved.
 
Thanks for the responses! So, when you say that it must remain in a closed environment, are you saying the answer would be the one dealing with lightning or the one dealing with outer space.. sorry I'm still a bit confused. :confused:
 
Well, determining that is the whole point of the problem. I agree with Dadface, though. The question isn't worded very well. You're just going to have to use some common sense in deciding what you think they were asking and therefore what the correct answer is.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top