Convert 55lb-65lb Draw Weight to 1/2kx^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter logaliciouz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Weight
AI Thread Summary
To convert draw weight from pounds to the formula 1/2kx^2, use pounds-of-force directly with feet for x, resulting in energy measured in foot-pounds. For energy in Joules, convert pounds to Newtons using the conversion factor of 4.445 Newtons per pound and use meters for x. The discussion highlights the successful application of an alternative method involving arrow velocity to achieve the desired results. This approach demonstrates the flexibility in calculating energy based on different parameters. Understanding these conversions is essential for accurate energy calculations in archery.
logaliciouz
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm Canadian, and I'm trying to convert the draw weight (55lb-65lb) into something I can put into 1/2kx^2. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use pounds-of-force directly and using feet for x, so long as you are happy with coefficient k being in pounds/foot, which are standard imperial units for spring coefficient.

Keep in mind that you'll get energy in foot-pounds. If you want to get energy in Joules, you should use meters for x and convert pounds-of-force to Newtons. There are 4.445 Newtons to a pound.
 
okay thanks, I actually tried using a different method of finding it, using the velocity of the arrow, and it ended up working
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top