Correct statement about internal energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the correct statement regarding internal energy from four options. Participants agree that option D, which states that internal energy can increase without energy transfer by heating, is correct, citing examples like adiabatic compression and the interaction of magnets. There is debate over the other options, particularly regarding the relationship between internal energy and temperature, with some arguing that these relationships can vary depending on the system. Counterexamples are provided to illustrate that internal energy can change while temperature remains constant. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of thermodynamic principles and the need for careful consideration of different systems.
songoku
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
389

Homework Statement


Which statement about internal energy is correct?
A. When two system have the same internal energy, they must be at the same temperature
B. When the internal energy of a system is increased, its temperature always rises
C. The internal energy of a system depends only on its temperature
D. The internal energy of a system can be increased without transfer of energy by heating

Homework Equations


U = PE + KE

ΔU = Q - W

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the answer is D my not sure about the reasoning. If let say I rub a metal against rough floor, the friction will increase the temperature of the metal hence the internal energy increase. Is this example of increasing internal energy without heating?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D is the correct answer according to me too but i had another example in my mind: Adiabatic compression of a gas, then we have ##Q=0## and ##\Delta U=-W##, that is the internal energy increases due to the mechanical work ##W## from the environmental surroundings to the gas.
 
songoku said:
Is this example of increasing internal energy without heating?
No, I think they are looking for a counterexample to the other options, i.e. an increase in internal energy without a temperature change.
 
haruspex said:
No, I think they are looking for a counterexample to the other options, i.e. an increase in internal energy without a temperature change.

Example mentioned by @Delta2 suits option D or maybe not because for ideal gas change in internal energy corresponds to change in temperature?
 
songoku said:
Example mentioned by @Delta2 suits option D or maybe not because for ideal gas change in internal energy corresponds to change in temperature?
I believe my example is correct regardless of how the internal energy of an ideal gas depends on temperature. Option D says that "can be increased" which means that if you find one example that satisfies it, it is enough.

@haruspex is just saying that maybe you should provide counter examples for the cases A to C, but i don't believe that is needed either.

Anyway one counterexample for B is for example we have a system that its internal energy increases due to flow of additional mass into the system at the same temperature. The temperature remains constant but because mass increases the internal energy also increases.
You can find similar counterexamples for A and C by considering the mass of the system...
 
Delta2 said:
@haruspex is just saying that maybe you should provide counter examples for the cases A to C, but i don't believe that is needed either
I am saying that since D contradicts the other options an example of D is necessarily a counterexample of the others.
 
I go with D also. It's undoubetdly correct, per post #2. But I woukld have thought B also to be correct. It certainly is for an ideal gas where internal energy is solely an increasing function of temperature and I would have thought that fact extended more or less for other substances.
 
rude man said:
I would have thought B also to be correct.
How about moving two magnets further apart? Wouldn't that increase internal energy, with no temperature change?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
rude man said:
I go with D also. It's undoubetdly correct, per post #2. But I woukld have thought B also to be correct. It certainly is for an ideal gas where internal energy is solely an increasing function of temperature and I would have thought that fact extended more or less for other substances.
Definitely not. It is also a function of specific volume. $$dU=C_VdT-\left[P-T\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V\right]dV$$
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
Definitely not. It is also a function of specific volume. $$dU=C_VdT-\left[P-T\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V\right]dV$$
If you solve for dT in the above is it really possible for U to increase without increasing T in a real system? Have you looked at this with the van der Waal equation for example? Or is it maybe true for liquids and/or solids exclusively?
 
  • #11
rude man said:
If you solve for dT in the above is it really possible for U to increase without increasing T in a real system? Have you looked at this with the van der Waal equation for example? Or is it maybe true for liquids and/or solids exclusively?
van der Waals equation: $$P=-\frac{a}{V^2}+\frac{RT}{(V-b)}$$
$$P-T\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\right)_V=-\frac{a}{V^2}$$
 
  • #12
No D is probably not the answer..because friction "does" involve transfer of heat energy itself.
C: As temperature is the average Kinetic Energy of all the particles in the body.. your first equation denies this fact. As you are adding P.E to K.E to get U
B: Yes. When the temperature of a body is increase, internal energy does increase because as temperature increases the particles will vibrate and move with more Kinetic Energy hence they will collide with each other and the surrounding plus their own Energy increases.
A: Yes and No both...because Heat(Internal) is Kinetic Energy at the microscopic level. So, the increase in Kinetic Energy of one, let's say photon, will be negligible...

Please correct me If I am wrong..
Thanks!
 
  • #13
Bilal Rajab Abbasi said:
No D is probably not the answer..because friction "does" involve transfer of heat energy itself.
Who said anything about friction in D?
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
Who said anything about friction in D?
Um, see The explanation at the end please

 
  • #15
Bilal Rajab Abbasi said:
Um, see The explanation at the end please
As I showed in posts #9 and 11, the internal energy of a gas can increase even if its temperature remains constant. The internal energy is the sum of the kinetic energy of the molecules and their potential energy of mutual interaction. When a real gas is compressed sufficiently, the molecules come close enough together to increase the potential energy of mutual interactions, and therefore internal energy.
 
  • #16
Bilal Rajab Abbasi said:
Um, see The explanation at the end please
That was only songoku's guess at how D could work. That guess can be wrong without making D wrong.
 
  • #17
I am really sorry for late reply.

haruspex said:
How about moving two magnets further apart? Wouldn't that increase internal energy, with no temperature change?

There is internal energy between two magnets? Can you please elaborate more about it?

Thanks
 
  • #18
songoku said:
I am really sorry for late reply.
There is internal energy between two magnets? Can you please elaborate more about it?

Thanks
In a system consisting of two magnets, wouldn't increasing their PE constitute adding internal energy to the system!
 
  • #19
haruspex said:
In a system consisting of two magnets, wouldn't increasing their PE constitute adding internal energy to the system!
In the more general version of the first law of thermodynamics, gravitational potential energy and macroscopic kinetic energy are treated separately from the internal energy U: $$\Delta E=\Delta U+\Delta (PE)+\Delta (KE)=Q-W$$ I think the same would apply to two magnets.

In the OPs first post, he mistakenly assumed that the U in the equation U=KE+PE is the same as the internal energy function U in the first law of thermodynamics. The U in the thermodynamic equation is the internal energy associated with small scale molecular interactions and random molecular kinetic energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #20
songoku said:
D. The internal energy of a system can be increased without transfer of energy by heating
if the system is compressed isobarically and adibatically then the internal energy increases .
e.g ΔU=-pΔV,
where ΔV <0
 
  • #21
songoku said:
B. When the internal energy of a system is increased, its temperature always rises
For ideal gas it is true as dU=Cvdt,
But may not be true for other gases.
 
  • #22
songoku said:
A. When two system have the same internal energy, they must be at the same temperature
Same for ideal gas but may not be true for other gas.
 
  • #23
Apashanka said:
For ideal gas it is true as dU=Cvdt,
But may not be true for other gases.
There is a very common situation where the internal energy of a system changes while the temperature stays constant. Thinking in terms of gases only is not the way to go.
Apashanka said:
Same for ideal gas but may not be true for other gas.
So if I have two ideal gases in different quantities at the same temperature, they have the same internal energy?
 
  • #24
DrClaude said:
There is a very common situation where the internal energy of a system changes while the temperature stays constant. Thinking in terms of gases only is not the way to go.
So if I have two ideal gases in different quantities at the same temperature, they have the same internal energy?
No mass need to be taken into account and also the specific heat at constt. volume
 
Last edited:
  • #25
Apashanka said:
No mass need to be taken into account and also the specific heat at constt. volume
Who said anything about specific heat? The statement is

A. When two system have the same internal energy, they must be at the same temperature

This is a generic statement. It is important for anyone wanting to understand thermodynamics that temperature by itself says nothing about the internal energy of a system. It is crucial to understand that energy is an extensive quantity while temperature is intensive.
 
  • #26
haruspex said:
In a system consisting of two magnets, wouldn't increasing their PE constitute adding internal energy to the system!
Oh I see.

Chestermiller said:
In the more general version of the first law of thermodynamics, gravitational potential energy and macroscopic kinetic energy are treated separately from the internal energy U: $$\Delta E=\Delta U+\Delta (PE)+\Delta (KE)=Q-W$$ I think the same would apply to two magnets.

In the OPs first post, he mistakenly assumed that the U in the equation U=KE+PE is the same as the internal energy function U in the first law of thermodynamics. The U in the thermodynamic equation is the internal energy associated with small scale molecular interactions and random molecular kinetic energy.

Yeah I always think they are the same :rolleyes:

I think I get it. Thank you very much for all the help
 
Back
Top