Coulomb's Law, net electrostatic force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net electrostatic force on a third particle with a charge of 2 μC, positioned at -2 cm, due to two other charges: -9 μC at 8 cm and 5 μC at 6 cm. The user applied Coulomb's Law but received an incorrect total force. The calculations for the forces between the charges were performed, but the user misunderstood the direction of the forces and the resultant magnitude. The correct approach involves ensuring that the signs of the forces are accurately considered based on the nature of the charges involved. The final magnitude of the net electrostatic force should be verified for accuracy.
nn3568
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle with charge −9 μC is located on the x-axis at the point 8 cm, and a second particle with charge 5 μC is placed on the x-axis at 6 cm. The Coulomb constant is 8.9875 × 109 N · m2/C2. What is the magnitude of the total electrostatic force on a third particle with charge 2 μC placed on the x-axis at −2 cm? Answer in units of N.


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law
fe = (kq1q2)/(d2)


The Attempt at a Solution


(8.9875e9 * 2e-6 * 5e-6) / (0.08^2) = 14.04296875
(8.9875e9 * 5e-6 * -9e-6) / (0.02^2) = -983.0078125
14.04296875 + -983.0078125 = -997.0507813
magnitude 997.0507813

Why is this wrong? What can I do to make it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nn3568 said:
(8.9875e9 * 5e-6 * -9e-6) / (0.02^2) = -983.0078125
You want the force on the 2μC charge.
 
Thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top