Cube Electric Field: Are Intersections Uniformly Distributed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the electric field lines from a positive charge at the center of a cube intersect the cube's sides uniformly. Participants note that field lines are denser at the center of the faces compared to the corners due to the varying distances from the charge. The relationship between field line density and strength is explored, indicating that density decreases with distance. It is concluded that while the average density on the cube is less than that on a sphere, the density at the points where the sphere touches the cube is equal. Overall, the intersections are not uniformly distributed across the cube's sides.
bocobuff
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A positive charge is located at the center of a cube.
Are the intersections of the field lines with a side of the box uniformly distributed across that side? Explain

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to picture this in my head and I'm getting stuck. I know the field lines in the corners are further away from the charge than the lines in the center of the cube face. But I can't determine if more lines would be coming into the corner of the face than the center, which would be perpendicular to the charge. Also, if the field lines did all intersect uniformly, wouldn't it be a sphere rather than a cube? I keep trying to visualize it like a golf ball in a kleenex box with lines coming out of the all dimples but I think I'm really over-thinking this one. Help if you can. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The corners are how much farther away than the middle of a face?

a/2 as opposed to √ 3*a/2

If the density of the lines is proportional to strength ...
 
and the greater the distance, the less the strength?
 
I've drawn a circle inscribed in a square, but I'm thinking of a sphere inscribed in a cube. The field line density around the sphere is uniform, N/Ss where N is the number of lines and Ss the surface area of the sphere.

The same N lines go through the enclosing cube so its density averages N/Sc.
But Sc > Ss so N/Sc < N/Ss. Less dense on the cube, on average.
However, at or near those points where the sphere touches the cube, the density is the same as on the cube - greater than the average on the cube.


In one corner you have N/4 lines coming out of the quarter sphere and then going through a quarter of the cube. The surface area of the quarter cube > surface area of the quarter sphere. Therefore the density of the lines is less on the cube than on the sphere. Except at or near the points where the sphere touches the cube and the line density of the cube is equal to that on the sphere.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top