Cube sliding down with frictionless slide

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of a cube sliding down a frictionless slide, only the height (h) and gravitational acceleration (g) are necessary, as derived from the conservation of mechanical energy. The initial mechanical energy is equal to the final kinetic energy, leading to the equation v = √(2gh). The alternative solution presented involves using the displacement (Δx) calculated with the Pythagorean theorem, which incorporates both the horizontal distance (d) and height (h), suggesting that more information is needed. However, this approach incorrectly assumes the acceleration down the slope is equal to g. The original method is validated as correct, requiring less information for the calculation.
Nikou
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube with m mass is released from the top of a slide, of h height, with a horizontal distance of d. [/B]

Homework Equations


Assuming there is no friction between the cube and the slide, ¿what is the minimal information i need to calculate the speed of the cube at the end of the slide? [/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to solve it using the conservation of mechanical energy, so:[/B]

Initial mechanical energy = mgh
Final mechanical energy = (mv2
Therefore

mgh=(mv2
gh=(v2
2gh=v2
√2gh=v


So i only need to know g and h to solve this but the solution is not that, according to the website where i got this problem. The solution of the problem would be this:

We have this:

v2f=v2i + 2gΔx
(v2i = 0 because at the beginning is static)

Where Δx is the displacement of the cube, therefore

vf=√(2gΔx)

To find the value of Δx we use phytagoras theorem:

Δx=√(d2+h2)

So to calculate vf we need to know d ,h, g

Why this solution is correct ,since mine requires less information?

(Sorry for my English, is not my first language)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nikou said:
v2f=v2i + 2gΔx
The above appears to be taking the acceleration down the slope as g, but it will be less than that.
Your answer is correct, the website's wrong.
 
Ok thank you! :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top