Current decay in closed circuit with only 1 resistor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating current decay in a closed circuit with a single resistor after a power source is removed. The initial current is 100A with a resistance of 1Ω, leading to a calculated power loss of 1e-5W. The participant expresses confusion about the decay constant, noting that without inductance or capacitance, the current should drop to zero immediately upon closing the switch. They also reference superconducting magnets operating in persistent mode, where current can flow indefinitely without resistance, and seek clarification on how resistance affects current decay and the role of inductance in this context. The conversation highlights the complexities of current behavior in ideal circuits versus real-world applications involving superconductivity.
GarethB84
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi this is my first post so please be nice :)

1. Homework Statement
The problem has been set up that a circuit containing a resistor and switch is being driven by a power source of unkown potential. The switch is flick to short the power source leaving only the resistor in a closed loop.
Calculate the current decay.
Initial current = 100A
Resistance = 1nLaTeX Code: \\Omega


2. Homework Equations

V=IR
Power = I2R



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I'm not too sure. The power generated, and hence the heat loss can be found to be 1e-5W so that's 1e-5 Joules per second of heat loss.

I'm not sure if we have enough information. Current decay involving inductance or capacitance is well known but just a resistor in a circuit of 'ideal' conductors?

I'm assuming it is an exponential decay of form I=I0e-t/LaTeX Code: \\tau but finding the decay constant is proving tricky. Any advice?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I'm a little confused here. If we're dealing with ideal components then it's clear with 0 capacitance and inductance the potential across the resistor drops immediately to 0 when the switch is closed since the current stops flowing in the absence of a source. So you can't make use of power dissipated in resistor because that will give you 0. Did you omit any information? Seems like you're not given enough.
 
Hi, thanks for the reply.

This is a sub question on a rather larger topic of superconducting magnets. I understand that these magnets can be run in persistent mode, whereby the power source is removed, and due to superconductivity, the current will remain flowing indefinetly. As soon as resistance is introduced into the circuit, the current will decay- the decay time varying with the size of the resistance.

What I'm unclear on is how to find this constant, and the theory behind persistent mode. Is it true the reason for persistent flow is that the energy stored in the magnet (inductance I suppose) pushes the current round the circuit. This energy doesn't decay as no ohmic heating occurs. Am I on the right line here??

If so, then will I have to assume a sensible value of inductance and work from there??


Thanks in advance,

Gareth
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top