Current through two different types of wire of different diameter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength required for equal current flow in a 2.0 mm diameter nichrome wire and a 1.0 mm diameter aluminum wire, with the aluminum wire having an electric field strength of 0.0080 V/m. The user attempted to derive the electric field for the nichrome wire using the relationship between current, conductivity, and area, ultimately arriving at an electric field value of approximately 0.078 V/m, which was deemed incorrect. Confusion arises regarding the relationship between the cross-sectional areas of the two wires and how it affects the calculations. The user expresses frustration over the discrepancy and plans to seek clarification from their professor. The thread highlights the importance of understanding the geometric factors in electrical calculations.
RichardEpic
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For what electric field strength would the current in a 2.0 mm diameter nichrome wire be the same as the current in a 1.0 mm diameter aluminum wire in which the electric field strength is 0.0080 V/m?

aluminum diameter = 1.0 mm
Same current(I) flowing through both wires

Homework Equations



J = sigma*E... I/A = sigma*E
so...I = sigma*E*A
sigma = 1/rho
sigma = conductivity; rho = resistivity

The Attempt at a Solution



Equating the two currents, I solved for the unknown E-field:

E(nichrome) = (E*A*sigma(aluminum))/(A*sigma(nichrome))
rho(nichrome) = 1.1*10^-6 Ωm
rho(aluminum) = 2.82*10^-8 Ωm

I calculated the E-field to be approximately 0.078 V/m, but this was apparently wrong. Help would be appreciated..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us the steps you took, so we can help you.
 
Really? All I did was "Equate the two current equations"...
So here it is:

σEA = σEA

The left side representing Nichrome, and then the right side representing aluminum. Then I solved for the E-field of the unknown wire getting:

E = (σEA)/(σA)

The top part of the fraction being aluminum properties, and the bottom being the properties of Nichrome. Is there anything that I have done wrong?
 
Your derivation was correct, I got the same result. What is the problem with it?

ehild
 
RichardEpic said:
Really? All I did was "Equate the two current equations"...
So here it is:

σEA = σEA

The left side representing Nichrome, and then the right side representing aluminum. Then I solved for the E-field of the unknown wire getting:

E = (σEA)/(σA)

The top part of the fraction being aluminum properties, and the bottom being the properties of Nichrome. Is there anything that I have done wrong?

How are the two areas related?
 
The homework website says my answer of 0.078 V/m is wrong. I'm utterly confused. I'll have to address my professor about this problem, as well as the other problem. I've double checked every single possible error for units, etc. as well.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top