Cyclotron, why do they not use electric fields?

AI Thread Summary
In a cyclotron, magnetic fields are preferred over electric fields for particle motion because magnetic fields exert a force that is always perpendicular to the particle's velocity, maintaining its speed while changing its direction. Using electric fields would complicate the process, as they would either need to be constantly adjusted to remain perpendicular or risk altering the particle's speed, which could lead to collisions with the cyclotron's walls. Additionally, electric fields tend to accelerate particles in their direction, which is undesirable once they are in the circular path. This makes it crucial to accelerate particles to high energies before they enter the cyclotron. Overall, magnetic fields simplify the engineering and operational aspects of maintaining a stable particle trajectory within the cyclotron.
gillgill
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
In a cyclotron, why do they not use electric fields to move them in circles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you could. A charged particle moving through a magnetic field experiences a force perpendicular to the velocity - this is tailor-made for moving something in a circle. Since the force is always perpendicular to the velocity, a magnetic field will not change the speed of the particle. All it will change is its direction. An electric field perpendicular to the velocity of the particle would do the same thing, but as the particle started to turn, you'd either have to change the direction of the electric field to keep it perpendicular to the velocity of the particle or you'd have to accept that the speed of the particle would change. In addition, if you didn't change the field, the component of the force perpendicular to the velocity would gradually be reduced (as the velocity changed) and so the radius of curvature of the particle's path would change. This could seriously complicate things, depending on what you were trying to do.

Given a particle stream of a particular speed, it's pretty easy to figure the strength of a magnetic field that will give a particular curve. Since the point is to keep the particles inside the cyclotron, the whole engineering thing is made easier (it seems to me) by the use of magnetic fields.

Is that enough?
 
yea...thats enough...thanks...^^
 
gillgill said:
yea...thats enough...thanks...^^

Though experimental particle physics is not my cup of tea,lemme try to give a justifiction of why they don't use in cyclotrones an electric field.
The electric field tends to drag the particles along the field's direction and to accelerate them.Let's assume for simplicity that both the magnetic field,and the elctric one are of constant magnitude.For obvious reasons,the particles need to be accelerated up to immense energies BEFORE ENTERING THE CIRCULAR RING.Why's that...??Because had there been an electric field which changes the magnitude and the speed of the particles which acted in the ring,no collision between the particles inside the ring would possible,since THERE WOULD NO PARTICLES LEFT,AS THEY ALL,UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE ELECTRIC FIELD WOULD BUMP INTO THE RING'S WALLS AND BE ABSORBED.
Form what i know,nobody has produced a circular loop of electric field.You could be having a standing/stationary em wave,but the necessity that the direction of the magnetic field be perpendicular to the circle of movement would require an electric field in the plane of the movements along the radius,since the wave vector should be kept tangent to the circle of movement.A radial electric field would definitely make the particles bump into the ring's walls.
 
thanks very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top