Deceleration of a mass down hill

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks confirmation on their calculations for the brake force required to stop a 2200kg truck rolling down an 8.5° slope at 0.204m/s over a distance of 0.5m. They calculated the gravitational force as 3190N and determined the required deceleration to be 0.041616m/s², resulting in a deceleration force of 91.55N. Adding this to the gravitational force gives a total brake force of 3281.555N. After clarifying the scenario, another user confirms that the original calculations appear correct. The discussion concludes with the user feeling reassured about their findings.
Big G
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Embarassed to ask as seems simple, i have done the maths but answer seems too low! - have looked all over for worked example to follow but no luck :(

I have a free rolling mass of 2200kg that is being driven down a slope at 0.204m/s.
This mass must be braked to a stop in 0.5m i need to calculate the brake force required to do this.

I have calculated mg sin8.5° = 3190N

v2=u2+2as => 0 = 0.041616 + 2a x 0.5m

a = 2 x -0.041616 /0.5 => cancels out to give 0.041616m/s/s

F=ma so 2200 x 0.041616 = 91.55N

Add together gives 3281.555N

Reason I'm scared is that the force to decelerate (91.55N) seems so small but reletive to the speed 0.5m is quite a long distance i suppose!

Can anyone confirm my reasoning please!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one able to confirm or condem my working?
 
Big G said:
No one able to confirm or condem my working?
It's not clear what the problem is that you are trying to solve.

Can you state the problem completely. (Is something rolling down a hill? What's the angle of the hill? What forces act on the object?)
 
Hi,

Sorry, it is a free rolling 'truck' but is being driven at a speed of 0.204m/s - it is driven directly on the tyres and due to the gearbox driving the tyre being 'self sustaining' the truck will not speed up down the hill, only continue at 0.204m/s.

The angle of the slope is 8.5°.

Only forces acting are to be assumed as gravity and the driving force.

At the point in question the power is removed from the gearbox and a short placed across the electric motor therefore using the gearbox to brake the truck to a halt in 0.5m

Hope that clarifys a bit...

Thanks!
 
OK, I think I understand what you're doing now. Your work looks correct.
 
Thank you very much for your help,

I think i can trust someone with that many posts to their name! :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top