Definite Integration with Upper bound as another integral.

xxviatorxx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, just got owned by my calc prof with a final exam question. Very very weird. Attempted it and different approach apparently gets u different answers. I have no idea what's going on..

View attachment Exam question.doc
I have attached the question as a word document. Too much integration to type and I cannot really use the Latex Reference well. Equation Builder in Microsoft Word is more helpful for me.

I have noticed too that the upper bound integral forms a non-elementary function thus I am unsure if my methods are right. The prof obviously wants us to really think hard. I sure hope the 1st approach of finding the general form first is right. The 2nd method of direct substitution from the initial start seems weird.

Thanks everyone for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first method is correct. Your second method fails because you are essentially claiming that G'(0)=\frac{d}{dy}G(0), which is nonsense. You must first differentiate and then plug in the point at which you want to find the derivative; doing things the other way around will always give you zero, regardless of the function you are differentiating.
 
YAY! THANKS! :D:D:D now i have ease of mind about my exam! :D:D:D thanks!

yeah i realized that too which doesn't seem to be making sense. the prof is one hell of a tricky guy. he loves doing stuff like that.

Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top