Derive Electric Field of Cylinder Via Gauss' Law

Jawbreaker
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
1. An infinitely long cylinder of radius R contains a uniform charge density Rho. Calculate the electric field using Gauss' law for r> R and R>r



3. I attached a pdf with my attempt at r>R. My answer doesn't agree with those given http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elecyl.html#c3". I noticed that length canceled but I'm not sure if my set up was done correctly. I solved the same problem using direct integration of Coulombs law and there I took the limit of L as it approached infinity. Any suggestions would be great. Thank you :]
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You just dropped the factor of r on the LHS of the second to last line. Other than this algebra error, your answer is correct.
 
Alright thanks for catching me there. So this is a correct way for setting up a problem for an infinite cylinder? I couldn't wrap my mind around how you could use gauss' law for an infinite surface or volume.
 
Yeah, your approach is correct.

If it helps, try to think about it this way: Apply Gauss's law to a finite cylinder, and then take the limit as the length go to infinity. (Since L cancels, you'll get the same answer.)

Of course you have to ignore edge effects on the field with this approach but since you plan on taking the L going to infinity limit anyway, this doesn't matter.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top