Determine the isentropic efficiency of a turbine

Kuddus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Neon gas at the rate of 100kg/min enters an adiabatic turbine at a temperature and pressure of 1073K and 1.5 MPa. The gas leaves the turbine at a pressure of 200kPa. If the real(actual) power output of the turbine is 370 kW, determine the isentropic efficiency of the turbine.


Homework Equations


Cp=0.5203 kJ/(kg.K)
y(gamma)=1.667


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kuddus said:

Homework Statement


Neon gas at the rate of 100kg/min enters an adiabatic turbine at a temperature and pressure of 1073K and 1.5 MPa. The gas leaves the turbine at a pressure of 200kPa. If the real(actual) power output of the turbine is 370 kW, determine the isentropic efficiency of the turbine.

Homework Equations


Cp=0.5203 kJ/(kg.K)
y(gamma)=1.667

The Attempt at a Solution

Kuddus, there is a reason for item 3. You have to attempt a solution or explain your thinking. For a start, is energy conserved here? Since the process is adiabatic, what does that tell you about the total energy? Where does the change in energy of the gas go?

What does isentropic mean? If the process was isentropic, what would the work output be? How does it compare to the actual work done?

AM
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top