Difference in potential energy of two charge configurations

theideasmith
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Chapter 24, Question 61

Given two configurations, ##C_1##, ##C_2## of ##N## point charges each, determine the smallest value of ##N## s.t. ##V_1>V_2##.

##C_1##:

##N## point charges are uniformly distributed on a ring s.t. the distance between adjacent electrons is constant

##C_2##:

##N-1## point charges are uniformly distributed on a ring s.t. the distance between adjacent electrons is constant and one charge is placed in the center of the ring.

Approach I

1. If we consider a gaussian surface inside the ring, ##E=0##. We know that the voltage at the center of the ring is $$V_\text{center}=\frac{Ne}{r}$$ and furthermore, because $V=\int E\circ ds$, $$V_\text{inside} = V_\text{center}$$
2. From this previous result, $$U_1 = eV_\text{center} = \frac{N(N-1)e^2}{r}$$
3. ##C_2##
the configuration potential without the center electron is $$(1/2)(N-1)(N-2)\frac{e}{r}$$ The center electron adds ##(N-1)\frac{e}{r}## yielding $$U_2 = (1/2)(N-1)(N-2)\frac{e}{r} + (N-1)\frac{e}{r}$$
4. Let ##k = \frac{e}{r}##, and, setting ##(N^2-N)k = (N^2-3N+2)k+(2N-2)k##
$$\implies 0=0$$

Approach II

Let ##N## charges be arranged along a circle with radius ##R##. The position of an arbitrary particle at an angle ##\theta## relative to the positive direction of the x-axis is ##\vec{P}(\theta) = (R\cos\theta, R\sin\theta)##. Pick one charge located at angle $\theta = \theta_i$ and another particle located at ##\theta = \theta_j## relative to the positive direction of the x-axis. The distance between the two particles ##\vec{r}## is

$$
\begin{align}
\vec{r} &= \|\vec{P}(\theta_j) - \vec{P}(\theta_i)\| \\
&= \|(R\cos\theta_j, R\sin\theta_j) - (R\cos\theta_i, R\sin\theta_i) \\
&= \|R(\cos\theta_j-\cos\theta_i, \sin\theta_j - \sin\theta_j)\|\\
&= R\|(\cos\theta_j-\cos\theta_i, \sin\theta_j - \sin\theta_j)\| \\
&= R \sqrt{
\cos^2\theta_j -2 \cos\theta_j\cos\theta_i + \cos^2\theta_i \\
+ \sin^2\theta_j -2 \sin\theta_j \sin\theta_i + \sin^2\theta_i
} \\
&= R\sqrt{
1-\sin^2\theta_j +1-\sin^2\theta_i + \sin^2\theta_j + \sin^2\theta_i \\
-2(\cos\theta_j\cos\theta_i+ \sin\theta_j \sin\theta_i)
}\\
&= R\sqrt{
2-2(\cos\theta_j \cos\theta_i + \sin\theta_j \sin\theta_i)
}\\
&=R\sqrt{2(1-\cos\theta_j \cos\theta_i - \sin\theta_j \sin\theta_i) } \\
& = R\sqrt{2(1-\cos(\theta_j + \theta_i))}\\
\therefore \vec{r} &= R\sqrt{2(1-\cos(\theta_j + \theta_i))}
\end{align}
$$

Where

$$
\theta_k = k\Delta \theta \\
\Delta\theta = \frac{2\pi}{N}
$$

We get

$$
\begin{aligned}
\vec{r} =R\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1-\cos\left((i+j)\frac{2\pi}{N}\right)}
\end{aligned}
$$

With this expression for ##\vec{r}##, we can write the net potential energy for particle ##j## along the circle with the equation assuming all particles have charges ##q##

$$
\begin{align}
U_\text{particle i} & = \sum_{j=1, i \ne j}^{N}
{
\frac{q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0R\sqrt{2(1-\cos(\theta_i + \theta_j))}}}\\
& = \frac{q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0R\sqrt{2}}\sum_{j=1, i \ne j}^{N}
{
\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta_i + \theta_j)}}} \\
& = \frac{q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0R\sqrt{2}}\sum_{j=2}^{N}
{
\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta_i + \theta_j)}}}
\end{align}
$$

we set ##j_\text{initial} =2## which is equivalent to the conditions ##j=1, j\ne i##
For concision, let

$$
L = \frac{q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0R}
$$

Then net potential energy can be expressed as

$$
\begin{align}
U(n)
& = \frac{1}{2}\sum_i^{n}U_i \\
& = \frac{L}{2} \sum_{i=1, j=2}^{n,n}
{
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2-2\cos(\Delta \theta(i+j-2))}}
} \\
&= \frac{nq^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}{
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1-\cos(j\Delta\theta))}}
}\\
&= \frac{nq^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}{
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1-\cos(j\frac{2\pi}{N}))}}
}\\
&= \frac{nq^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}{
\frac{1}{4\sin(\frac{j\pi}{N})}
}\\
&= \frac{nq^2}{32\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}{
\csc\left(j\frac{\pi}{N}\right)
} \\
\end{align}
$$

For two configurations with ##N## charges we define the potential energies:

$$
U_1 = U(N) \\
U_2 = U(N-1) + (N-1)L
$$

where the second term in the definition of ##U_2## determines the potential for the lone particle in the center.

Now we solve for the ##N## at which ##U_1 = U_2##

$$
\begin{aligned}
U_1 - U_2& = \Delta U \\
&=N\frac{q^2}{32\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}{
\csc\left(j\frac{\pi}{N}\right)
}\\
&+(1-N)\frac{q^2}{32\pi\epsilon_0R}
\sum_{j=1}^{n-2}{
\csc\left(j\frac{\pi}{N-1}\right)
}\\
& +(1-N)L
\end{aligned}

$$

Which is really difficult to solve directly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theideasmith said:
Given two configurations, ##C_1##, ##C_2## of N point charges each, determine the smallest value of ##N## s.t. ##V_1>V_2##.
Are ##V_1## and ##V_2## the electrostatic potential energies associated with each distribution?
theideasmith said:
If we consider a gaussian surface inside the ring, ##E=0##
How do you figure? The electric flux out of the Gaussian surface is zero, but this doesn't mean that the electric field everywhere must be zero as a result. For example, what if the configuration has N = 2?
2charges.png
 
theideasmith said:
Which is really difficult to solve directly.

After fixing up my algebra, I ended up with the equation

$$\begin{aligned}
U_2-U_1 &= 0 \\
&= L\frac{N-1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N-2}{\csc\left(\frac{j\pi}{N-1}\right)}
+ L(N-1)2
- L\frac{N}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N-1}{\csc\left(\frac{j\pi}{N}\right)} \\
&= L\left(\frac{N-1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N-2}{\csc\left(\frac{j\pi}{N-1}\right)}
- \frac{N}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{N-1}{\csc\left(\frac{j\pi}{N}\right)}
+ 2(N-1)
\right)
\end{aligned}$$

and numerically solved for ##N## by plotting the series for ##U_1## and ##U_2##.
MDdbAwt.png

I got ##N=12##.

Lesson: Sometimes brute force is necessary.
Full solution: http://theideasmith.github.io/2017/02/14/Point-Charge-Configuration.html
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top