Diffraction condition - Kittel's Intro to Solid State Physics 8th ed.

DiogenesTorch
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How to derive equation (22) on page 31 of Kittel's Intro to Solid State Physics 8th edition.

The equation is: 2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G}+G^2=0


Homework Equations



The diffraction condition is given by \Delta\vec{k}=\vec{G} which from what I can surmise is the starting point for the derivation

Here are some other relevant equations/definitions
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \vec{k} &amp; &amp; \text{ incident wave vector} \\<br /> \vec{k&#039;} &amp; &amp; \text{ outgoing\reflected wave vector} \\<br /> \Delta \vec{k&#039;} = \vec{k&#039;}-\vec{k} &amp; &amp; \text{ scattering vector} \\<br /> \vec{G} &amp; &amp; \text{ reciprocal lattice vector} \\<br /> \end{align*}<br />



The Attempt at a Solution



Starting with the diffraction condition \Delta\vec{k}=\vec{G}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \Delta\vec{k} &amp;= \vec{G} &amp; \\<br /> \vec{k&#039;}-\vec{k} &amp;= \vec{G} &amp; \\<br /> \vec{k}+\vec{G} &amp;= \vec{k&#039;} &amp; \\<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k&#039;}|^2 &amp; \text{If 2 vectors are equal, their squared magnitudes are equal}\\<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \text{since magnitudes k and k&#039; are equal}\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Using the law of cosines we now have

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \nonumber \\<br /> |\vec{k}|^2 + |\vec{G}|^2 -2|\vec{k}||\vec{G}|\cos\theta &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \text{(1)} \\<br /> \end{align}<br />

\cos\theta is the cosine of the angle between the vectors \vec{k} and \vec{G} which is just

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \cos\theta=\frac{\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G}}{|\vec{k}||\vec{G}|}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Substituting the above into equation (1)

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> |\vec{k}|^2 + |\vec{G}|^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 \\<br /> |\vec{G}|^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= 0 \\<br /> G^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= 0 \\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

However the book is showing 2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} + G^2 = 0

Why is Kittel losing the minus sign in front of the dot product? I have been scratching my head for hours and can't find my error. I know this is some bone-headed oversight on my part but can't seem to find my error.


Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If \theta is the angle between \vec{k} and \vec{G} then the angle in the law of cosines should be 180^o-\theta
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top