Dipole in a nonuniform electric field problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force and torque on a dipole in a nonuniform electric field created by a point charge. The dipole consists of two charges separated by a distance, and the point charge is positioned far from the dipole. Participants agree on the need to treat the dipole charges as point charges and analyze the force components, noting that the x-component cancels out. The correct expression for the net y-component of the force is provided, emphasizing the importance of the assumption that the distance r is much greater than s. The conversation highlights the necessity of incorporating this assumption into the calculations for accurate results.
BrainMan
Messages
279
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A point charge Q is held at a distance r from the center of a dipole that consists of two charges ±q separated by a distance s. The dipole is initially oriented so that Q is in the plane bisecting the dipole. Assume that r≫s.

A) Immediately after the dipole is released, what is the magnitude of the force on the dipole?

B) Immediately after the dipole is released, what is the magnitude of the torque on the dipole?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[PLAIN]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/krQ_JEzmRURs4ZqAkRwrapePDCVyz9DBcELyMJ8-tY1g2JYfSLGdkD4lv4_F_2FaaeXrNoN-ZofGqnvD3VNp8AgsogPnk_kYrS2RL9SY5A6K-q9RTfBwq5_Nv_exlvGk5w_Ui0p2kXAdQa1Jw005jR1eRS9G-0lFjnzhD7CfsHB8-pmm0Kxj-BRM_MQbHapBvyIVizorUYPVqCZNcPo1I8I0u83mzPTSJJdylwMoiC2qDsochCphoyNwRT62P_0p_VF0SKk2qpIhhLIdGO9EUow30nxJjp4EvvSKOMZGSaHl-aXsbewtiwn9ky2DmswaV_GOlaW2UFAhDKbytrYhK9GJ-kyP_PLobfQ_jyhIkKldBX29OF8DUKXyodk6Q4n3N5aW1X10msWQ_tzuchKdsmubrePdPNWxTWIHfLr4z9PL4NeXi5BaCm7QSaWWAyAWmRTkJwUx7AE9zwLyqdBmrwSxZIgZlK2z5_LM8rlKqCK3XdixKgaDBS9tOzi4wLe9Gp96Jn7gJpG_m5EwwgaA3LVHTWIWAWFvqzb_FXTW86j-81g_mAdb2Xltz2xyBYoA_Ozaai1Q46fI5-cPOp7f_rezMCPQ5gmLG-jD6g6m-KSyFMMzCkuT=w497-h662-no[/B]

I treated the two charges on the dipole as point charges and then found the force vectors acting on them. Then I broke down the forces into their components and added them. The x components canceled and I was left with just a y component. For some reason this is wrong, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not easy to read what the y-component is. Can you use LaTeX to write it down? I agree that the x-component is zero.
 
kuruman said:
It is not easy to read what the y-component is. Can you use LaTeX to write it down? I agree that the x-component is zero.

Here is the net y-component of the force.

\frac{Qqs}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}(r^2+\frac{s^2}{4})^{3/2}}
 
I suspect that they want you to incorporate their specified assumption: Assume that r≫s
 
gneill said:
I suspect that they want you to incorporate their specified assumption: Assume that r≫s
Exactly what I was about to type in. Before you do that, factor out of the radical r in the denominator.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top