Dipole in an Uniform Electric Field concept?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of torque in a dipole within a uniform electric field, explaining how torque is calculated using the formula T = p x E. The participants clarify the relationship between force, distance, and torque, specifically why torque can be expressed as F * L sin(x) and how it relates to the dipole moment. They also address the importance of the center of mass in torque calculations, noting that the derivation may vary if the center is not equidistant from the ends of the dipole. The conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying principles of torque and its application in dipole scenarios. Overall, the explanation enhances comprehension of torque in the context of electric fields and dipoles.
fallen186
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Dipole in an Uniform Electric Field:
torque is calculated about the position of either charge has the magnitude FLsin(x) = qELsin(x) = pEsin(x). The direction of the torque vector is into the paper such that it tends to rotate the dipole moment vector p so it aligns with the direction of E. The torque can be expressed most concisely as the cross product: T = p x E

I don't know why the magnitude is F * L sin(x) or why qE turns into pE. And I don't understand what the concept iit s trying to tell me. It would also be helpful if someone could explain the hand thing for torque. I understand most of the stuff about torque but not the hand thing.

Homework Equations


x = theta
L = distance between charges in dipole
p = vector of the dipole movement that points from negtive charge to positive.
p =q*L

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is all given in a standard textbook. Did you overlook it? Perhaps, the magnitude of the torque may be clearer this way: T = F*L*sin(x) = 2*[F*(L/2)*sin(x)] The L/2 is the distance from the center of the dipole to one of its ends, and since there are two ends that experience a torque in the same direction we multiply by 2. Does this help at all?
 
buffordboy23 said:
This is all given in a standard textbook. Did you overlook it? Perhaps, the magnitude of the torque may be clearer this way: T = F*L*sin(x) = 2*[F*(L/2)*sin(x)] The L/2 is the distance from the center of the dipole to one of its ends, and since there are two ends that experience a torque in the same direction we multiply by 2. Does this help at all?

Thanks, that does clear things up
 
After I logged off, I realized that I could have been clearer. My description in the previous post is only valid if the center of the mass is equidistant from both of the ends of the dipole, which may not always be the case. Therefore, it's derivation is a "special" case of the more "general" case. There is a better way to describe the magnitude of the torque.

Let "L" be the length of the dipole from end to end. Now suppose that the center of the mass is not equidistant from both ends of the dipole. Then one end lies "y" units away from the center of mass and the other end must lie "L-y" units away. The net torque on the dipole is the sum of the torques: T = F*y*sin(x) + F*(L-y)*sin(x) = F*y*sin(x) + F*L*sin(x) - F*y*sin(x) = F*L*sin(x). Notice that this result is of the same magnitude as before but we got here by a different route.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top