Dipole moment electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential from a dipole moment of 2.6 nCm at a distance of 18 cm. For part (a), the user struggles with the equation for the electric potential at an angle of 42 degrees, initially using an incorrect approach and arriving at values of 1.08 kV and 0.971 kV, which are deemed incorrect. The user seeks clarification on the correct formula for the dipole moment and how to incorporate the angle into the calculations. In part (b), the user notes that the perpendicular bisector is at 90 degrees, leading to a potential of zero when multiplied by cos(90 degrees). The discussion highlights the challenges in applying the correct equations for electric dipoles and the need for further assistance.
jelliDollFace
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



what is the potential 18 cm from a dipole moment 2.6nCm at
a) 42 deg to axis
b) on the perpendicular bisector

note: dipole separation << 18cm

Homework Equations



electric dipole moment, p = qd where q is charge, d is distance
electric potential for point charge, V = kq/r where k is 9*10^9 and r is distance

The Attempt at a Solution



a) 42 degrees

i think my eq may be wrong, but...

p =qd sin (theta) where theta = 42deg
so q = p/dsin(theta)

so V = [k(p/dsin(theta)]/r

so using sin(42) i got V = 1.08 kV and using cos(42) i got V = 0.971 kV --> both incorrect

i'm guessing my eq for electric dipole moment is wrong, i was thinking along the lines of the torque eq, rFsin(theta)

b) not attempted yet, but what is the perpendicular bisector? any tips much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how do i factor in the angle into the dipole moment for part a?
 
anyone, its been 4 days, please help
 
for part a, i just mulitplied the V you get in the beginning (on the dipole axis) by cos(angle given).
for b, the perpendicular bisector is 90 degrees from the, and if u multiply V by cos(90 deg) you get zero.
at least that's how i solved it, and my answers came out right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top