Dipole moment of given charge distribution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the dipole moment of a specific charge distribution described by a delta function in cylindrical coordinates. The charge distribution is characterized as a circular arrangement in the z-plane at a distance R from the origin, leading to considerations of symmetry and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the dipole moment by separating it into x, y, and z components. There are questions about the role of the unit vector in the integral and the implications of symmetry on the result. Some participants express uncertainty about the complexity of using cylindrical coordinates and the relationship between displacement and position in this context.

Discussion Status

Multiple participants have confirmed that their calculations yield a dipole moment of zero, citing symmetry as a reason. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of using cylindrical coordinates and the necessity of including unit vectors in the calculations. Some participants are considering the effects of bound charges and the choice of coordinate systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of net charge in the distribution and discuss how this influences the choice of the coordinate system. There are references to potential difficulties in interpreting vectors in cylindrical coordinates versus Cartesian coordinates.

ks_wann
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
So, I've got a charge distribution given by:
\begin{equation}
\rho(r,\phi,z)=\frac{q}{2\pi R}\delta(r-R)\delta(z)\cos(2\phi)
\end{equation}

This, if I'm not mistaken, translates into a circular charge distribution located in the z-plane, a distance R from origo.

Thus

\begin{equation}
\rho(R,\phi,0)=\frac{q}{2\pi R}\cos(2\phi)
\end{equation}

I compute the total charge of the ring, which by my calculations is 0. Now I want to use

\begin{equation}
\mathbf{p}=\int\mathbf{r^{\prime}}\rho(\mathbf{r^{\prime}})dl^{\prime}
\end{equation}

to find the dipole moment, where

\begin{equation}
dl^{\prime}=Rd\phi.
\end{equation}

Inserting in the equation, I get:
\begin{equation}
\mathbf{p}=\int R\mathbf{\hat{r}}\frac{q}{2\pi R}\cos(2\phi)Rd\phi \\ = \frac{Rq}{2\pi}\mathbf{\hat{r}}\int_{0}^{2\pi} \cos(2\phi)d\phi = 0
\end{equation}

I'm not sure if the last steps makes sense..

I'd be grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
... a circular charge distribution located in the z=0 plane, a distance R from the origin.

Right.

What you did was fine as far as it went. But I would now split up your p integral into x, y and z components: px, py and pz.

So we would then get
p = px i + py j + pz k and

r' = R cosø i + R sinø j + 0 k
most of which you already have.

So take your integral for p, separate into x, y & z components, and finally obtain p from px, py and pz.

I haven't finished solving the problem but will if you are interested.
 
Last edited:
The answer is indeed zero by symmetry but you made a mistake in your calculation. the unit vector "r-hat" cannot be removed from the integral because its direction is a function of ø.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I did the integrations and confirm that px = py = pz = 0.
 
I did the integration in x, y and z components, and I also get 0.

Is it much harder to solve the problem in cylindrical coordinates, given that "r-hat" is a function of ø? I would include the "r-hat" into the integral in my final step, find the expression for "r-hat" of ø (if one such exists in cylindrical coordinates?) and integrate.

Also, is the dipole moment 0 due to no bound charges in the distribution?
 
ks_wann said:
I did the integration in x, y and z components, and I also get 0.

Is it much harder to solve the problem in cylindrical coordinates, given that "r-hat" is a function of ø? I would include the "r-hat" into the integral in my final step, find the expression for "r-hat" of ø (if one such exists in cylindrical coordinates?) and integrate.

Also, is the dipole moment 0 due to no bound charges in the distribution?

I haven't tried to integrate in cylindrical coordinates so don't know. I might look into it.

All I can tell you regarding net charge is that if there is no net charge the coordinate system can be chosen arbitrarily. Naturally in this case the origin should be the center of the circular charge distribution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I guess I have a basic prblem with cylindrical coordinates. It's based on the fact that a vector gives displacement but not position. Example:
r = 2 i + 3 j
displacement = √(4+9) = √13.
position is (2,3).

But, in cylindrical coordinates using unit vectors, the same r is r = √13 r-hat + 0
The displacement is correct but the position can be anywhere on a circle of radius √13 .

I usually wind up with going x = r cosθ, y = r sinθ, z. In other words, back to cartesian.

Of course you could define this vector as √13 ∠ tan-1(3/2) but that is not using unit vectors.

I would welcome comments from anyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K