Do Lorentz Transformations Affect Simultaneity in Different Frames?

DarkMalice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Anyone help. I know I must be doing this wrong somehow

Lightning hits both a tree and a pole. The spacetime coordinates for each is (x=0, t=10us) for the tree and (x=30000m, t=10us) for the pole relative to the ground. Therefore they occur simultaneously relative to the ground. A rocket comes whizzing by at 0.5c in the x-direction. Find the spacetime coordinates relative to the rocket. Do the events happen simultaneously in the rocket's frame? (us is microseconds by the way)


First and foremost, I was able to find the factor y as y= 1/(1-.05^2)^.5 = 1.1547

Using Lorentz transformations
For the tree
x'= 1.1547 X [0 -(0.5c)(10us)]
= -1732.05m

t'=1.1547 X [10us -(0.5c)(0)/c^2]
= 11.547us

For the pole
x'= 1.1547 X [30000-(0.5c)(10us)]
= 32908.95

t'= 1.1547 X [10us - (0.5c)(30000)/c^2]
=-46.18us


What I want to know is why is x'(pole)-x'(tree)> 30000? Shouldn't the distance between both poles go through length contraction in the rocket's frame and therefore be shorter than 30000?

Please someone help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're comparing the location of the tree and the location of the pole at different times in the rocket's frame. To find the distance between the two, you need to compare where they are at the same time.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top