Crystal Structure & Metallic Bond: What Comes First?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between metallic bonding and crystal structure, specifically whether the type of bond determines the crystal structure or vice versa. It highlights that different types of bonds, such as ionic and metallic, can coexist in various crystal structures, indicating that the bond type is not solely dictated by the crystal form. Examples like cobalt and nickel illustrate how subtle differences in bonding can lead to different packing structures despite similar properties. The conversation also touches on carbon's ability to adopt different bonding configurations based on its environment, affecting its crystal structure. Ultimately, the interplay between bonding and crystal structure is complex and influenced by various factors, including atomic fit and environmental conditions.
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
For metals for instance, is the metallic bond that determines the crystal structure(i.e. FCC (face centered cubic), HCP (hexagonal close packed)) or is the crystal structure that determines the type of bond?

In other words, if someone were to ask me what kind of bond an element with an FCC structure has, is that all I need to know to figure it out?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


Raziel2701 said:
For metals for instance, is the metallic bond that determines the crystal structure(i.e. FCC (face centered cubic), HCP (hexagonal close packed)) or is the crystal structure that determines the type of bond?

In other words, if someone were to ask me what kind of bond an element with an FCC structure has, is that all I need to know to figure it out?

crystals don't necessarily have to be FCC or HCP, different types of bonds can have both (ionic and metallic; you can't say that "oh this is FCC it can't be metallic/ionic").

in short the specific type of intermolecular force has little to do with the crystal structure.
 


In general this is a very difficult question. For simple metallic alineations like brass, the structure depends on the electron density, look for Hume Rothery phases.
 


DrDu said:
In general this is a very difficult question. For simple metallic alineations like brass, the structure depends on the electron density, look for Hume Rothery phases.

DrDu is quite right. Here is an interesting case for the original poster to consider: Cobalt and nickel have near identical molar masses, near identical atom sizes, and exactly identical metal densities. But cobalt packs as hexagonal close-packed, while nickel packs as cubic close-packed (i.e. face-centred cubic). Both metals have very similar chemistry – there is some very subtle factor in the bonding that tips the balance between the two close-packed structures.
 


I´d say that it is both ways.

Consider carbon.

Carbon is able to have either sp3 bonds, in saturated compounds and in diamond, or sp2 bonds, in unsaturated compounds and in graphite.

The physical environment, neighbouring atoms around the carbon in molecule and cristal, can and do force the atom to have either sp3 or sp2 bonds.

But one or other of these makes for a poorer fit. And it is the good or poor fit of atoms and their bonds into molecule or crystal structures that drives chemical reactions and allotropic transition.

In case of carbon, diamond is very slightly a poorer fit than graphite. But the bonds are still so strong that breaking them to rearrange then for better fit takes heating over 1000 celsius.

Now have a look at cobalt and nickel, and iron for a good measure.

Iron can fit together either as body centered cubic or face centered cubic.

These 2 are actually so close in energy that on heating, BCC iron converts into FCC at 912 degrees - and then back into BCC at 1390 degrees.

(Iron can also have HCP ε-Fe at high pressures above 100 kbar).

Now, neither cobalt nor nickel form BCC. Both are FCC at high temperatures - and freely mix with FCC iron.

Addition of nickel (FCC at all temperatures) to iron stabilizes FCC iron, because nickel mixes freely with FCC iron, but makes a poor fit in BCC iron. Up to about 6 % of Ni does fit into BCC iron, but not more.

If over 20 % of Ni is added to FCC iron, then the resulting FCC structure is stable at all temperatures, and is used for stainless steel.

If, however, the nickel concentration is between 6 % and 20 % then on cooling, there is not enough nickel to stabilize FCC, but too much to fit in BCC. The result is that BCC crystallizes out in separate crystals which reject nickel in growth - forming Widmanstätten pattern.

Now, pure cobalt is FCC above 420 degrees - and forms HCP below 420 degrees. But since at such a low temperature allotropic transitions are hard, the transformation often does not happen or happens only partially.

But unlike Ni, Co fits fairly well into BCC, so that Fe-Co alloys up to about 70 % Co transform to BCC at lower temperatures. The alloys closer to Co stay FCC unless they are over 90 % Co and can carry Fe into HCP structure.

There have been predictions that Ni should also be able to form HCP structure - only below about 200 degrees. But since transformations would not happen at these temperatures, HCP nickel has never been found.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top