Does Specific Heat Capacity Affect the Speed of Heat Transfer in Calorimeters?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether specific heat capacity affects the speed of heat transfer in calorimeters. It is noted that while specific heat capacity relates heat energy to temperature changes, it does not directly determine the rate of heat transfer. The calorimeter with lower specific heat capacity will experience a greater temperature change with less heat transferred compared to the higher specific heat capacity calorimeter. Heat transfer continues until the temperature difference between the water and calorimeter reaches zero. Ultimately, the lower specific heat capacity setup will have a higher temperature once heat transfer ceases.
Pseudopro
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a problem I made myself and it's really confusing me. You have 100mL of water and place it in a calorimeter of low specific heat capacity. You put another 100mL of water in another calorimeter of high specific heat capacity. Assume in both instances that the water is of a higher temperature than the calorimeters. Assume the water in both instances start at the same temperature. Assume the calorimeters start at the same temperature. They are closed systems. Will there be a difference in SPEED of heat energy transfer in each case.


Homework Equations


No calculations?


The Attempt at a Solution


While specific heat capacity tells us the relationship between heat energy and temperature, it doesn't seem to me to specify how fast the transfer is. I'm thinking right now that the heat energy transfer will be exactly the same for both instances. Only the calorimeter of higher shc will have a lower deltaT/t but heat transfer should be exactly the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pseudopro said:
While specific heat capacity tells us the relationship between heat energy and temperature, it doesn't seem to me to specify how fast the transfer is. I'm thinking right now that the heat energy transfer will be exactly the same for both instances. Only the calorimeter of higher shc will have a lower deltaT/t but heat transfer should be exactly the same?

Problems involving heat capacities and temperature differences often contain a phrase like "after a long time", or "when equilibrium is reached", in order to gloss over the dynamics of the heat exchange process. This occurs when the concepts being elucidated pertain to energy conservation and matter state transitions and such.

At some point you should come across problems that do worry about the actual rates of heat energy movement. They show up as scenarios with cooling or heating objects of various forms and in various ways, and Newton's Law of Cooling will appear.

Heat transfer is driven by temperature difference. Your low shc calorimeter will experience a greater change in temperature with less heat transferred to it than will the higher shc calorimeter. Once the temperature difference between the contents and the calorimeter has gone to zero, the heat transfer stops, too.
 
Thanks gneill. When both heat transfers stop, will the lower shc setup have a higher temperature?
 
Pseudopro said:
Thanks gneill. When both heat transfers stop, will the lower shc setup have a higher temperature?

It should. It takes less heat to raise its temperature, it it "steals' less heat from the source.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
15K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top