Does the book have an error in the addition of these two vectors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential error in a textbook regarding the addition of vectors. The calculated unit vector from the given vectors results in components of approximately 0.923 for x, 0.355 for y, and 0.142 for z. The textbook, however, lists the z-component as 0.4, which raises questions about its accuracy. Participants suggest that this discrepancy may stem from a typographical error, particularly since 0.4 has only one significant figure compared to the others. The consensus leans towards the calculated values being correct, indicating a possible mistake in the book.
CaliforniaRoll88
Messages
35
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Given the vectors ##\vec M = -10\hat a_x+4\hat a_y-8\hat a_z## and ##\vec N = 8\hat a_x+7\hat a_y-2\hat a_z## , find: (a) a unit vector in the direction of ##-\vec M - 2\vec N##
Relevant Equations
##\hat a_B=\frac {\vec B} {\sqrt {B^2_x+B^2_y +B^2_z}}##
(a)
$$\vec A = -\vec M+2\vec N=26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z$$
Unit Vector Formula
$$\hat a_A=\frac{26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z}{\sqrt {26^2+10^2+4^2}}$$
$$0.923\hat a_x+0.355\hat a_y+0.142\hat a_z$$
The book gives ##0.92\hat a_x+0.36\hat a_y+0.4\hat a_z##
Not sure how the book get 0.4 for the z-component. Maybe it's an error.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
Homework Statement: Given the vectors ##\vec M = -10\hat a_x+4\hat a_y-8\hat a_z## and ##\vec N = 8\hat a_x+7\hat a_y-2\hat a_z## , find: (a) a unit vector in the direction of ##-\vec M - 2\vec N##
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
$$\vec A = -\vec M+2\vec N=26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z$$
I assume that the latter is correct (plus sign, not minus, in front of ##2N##).
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
$$0.923\hat a_x+0.355\hat a_y+0.142\hat a_z$$
The book gives ##0.92\hat a_x+0.36\hat a_y+0.4\hat a_z##
Not sure how the book get 0.4 for the z-component. Maybe it's an error.
Considering that the answer is given with two significant figures and that ##0.4## only has one, this looks like a typo (missing 1).
 
  • Like
Likes CaliforniaRoll88 and PeroK
Much appreciated.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top