Does the book have an error in the addition of these two vectors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential error in a textbook regarding the addition of vectors. The calculated unit vector from the given vectors results in components of approximately 0.923 for x, 0.355 for y, and 0.142 for z. The textbook, however, lists the z-component as 0.4, which raises questions about its accuracy. Participants suggest that this discrepancy may stem from a typographical error, particularly since 0.4 has only one significant figure compared to the others. The consensus leans towards the calculated values being correct, indicating a possible mistake in the book.
CaliforniaRoll88
Messages
35
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Given the vectors ##\vec M = -10\hat a_x+4\hat a_y-8\hat a_z## and ##\vec N = 8\hat a_x+7\hat a_y-2\hat a_z## , find: (a) a unit vector in the direction of ##-\vec M - 2\vec N##
Relevant Equations
##\hat a_B=\frac {\vec B} {\sqrt {B^2_x+B^2_y +B^2_z}}##
(a)
$$\vec A = -\vec M+2\vec N=26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z$$
Unit Vector Formula
$$\hat a_A=\frac{26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z}{\sqrt {26^2+10^2+4^2}}$$
$$0.923\hat a_x+0.355\hat a_y+0.142\hat a_z$$
The book gives ##0.92\hat a_x+0.36\hat a_y+0.4\hat a_z##
Not sure how the book get 0.4 for the z-component. Maybe it's an error.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
Homework Statement: Given the vectors ##\vec M = -10\hat a_x+4\hat a_y-8\hat a_z## and ##\vec N = 8\hat a_x+7\hat a_y-2\hat a_z## , find: (a) a unit vector in the direction of ##-\vec M - 2\vec N##
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
$$\vec A = -\vec M+2\vec N=26\hat a_x+10\hat a_y+4\hat a_z$$
I assume that the latter is correct (plus sign, not minus, in front of ##2N##).
CaliforniaRoll88 said:
$$0.923\hat a_x+0.355\hat a_y+0.142\hat a_z$$
The book gives ##0.92\hat a_x+0.36\hat a_y+0.4\hat a_z##
Not sure how the book get 0.4 for the z-component. Maybe it's an error.
Considering that the answer is given with two significant figures and that ##0.4## only has one, this looks like a typo (missing 1).
 
  • Like
Likes CaliforniaRoll88 and PeroK
Much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top