Doppler Effect: can light waves have different effects, depending on your speed?

AI Thread Summary
The Doppler Effect applies to light waves, causing them to shift in wavelength depending on the observer's speed relative to the source. When moving toward light, wavelengths shorten, resulting in a blue shift, while moving away causes a red shift. This shift is a real physical phenomenon, not merely an illusion of human perception. Consequently, if one were to travel quickly toward electromagnetic radiation, such as infrared, it could theoretically be experienced as microwaves, potentially heating water. The effects of radiation on an observer can indeed change based on their speed relative to the source of the electromagnetic radiation.
The Head
Messages
137
Reaction score
2
I have a question about of light waves. Moving at high speeds toward or away from visible light could be the difference of experiencing that light as violet or red. Of course this experience is due to the photoreceptors in the eye seemingly experiencing a shorter or longer wavelength. My question is: Is this effect real, or specifically an illusion that the eye experiences? To clarify, if theoretically you could travel toward electromagnetic radiation quickly enough-- let's say in the infrared range-- could you really be experiencing the radiation in the form of microwaves (would water you had with you heat up)?

Essentially, can the speed at which you approach EMR change the effects that radiation has on you because of a change in the wavelength of radiation you experience? Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The doppler shift is absolutely real, and in no way tied to how humans perceive light. The light really does get a longer/shorter wavelength, and everything that comes with this. I.e. if I'm in a box with a glass window getting bombarded by microwaves, I cannot tell if someone has opened the microwave door and is pointing it at me or I am simply receding very quickly from my friend's flashlight.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top