Double integral - change of variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the double integral of the function \(\cos\left(\frac{y - x}{y + x}\right)\) over a trapezoidal region defined by the vertices (1,0), (2,0), (0,2), and (0,1). The participants emphasize the importance of choosing the right change of variables to simplify either the region of integration or the integrand. A suggested substitution is \(u = x + y\) to simplify the integration, while \(v = y - x\) is proposed to further aid in the evaluation. The conversation highlights the intertwined nature of integrand simplification and region adjustment in double integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals and their evaluation
  • Familiarity with change of variables in integration
  • Knowledge of Cartesian coordinates and trapezoidal regions
  • Basic trigonometric functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of change of variables in double integrals
  • Learn about Jacobians and their role in transformations
  • Explore examples of integrating functions over non-rectangular regions
  • Investigate advanced techniques for simplifying integrands in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with multivariable calculus, particularly in evaluating double integrals and applying change of variables effectively.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble evaluating the following integral.

[tex] \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_R^{} {\cos \left( {\frac{{y - x}}{{y + x}}} \right)} } dA[/tex]

Where R is the trapezoidal region with vertices (1,0), (2,0), (0,2) and (0,1).

I a drew a diagram and found that R is the region bounded by the lines y = - x + 2, y = -x + 1, x = 0 and y = 0.

Firstly, I would like to ask when attempting questions requiring a change of variables, is the priority to make the region of integration simpler or the integrand simpler? I ask this because I am often not sure how to approach these sorts of questions so if I have the correct starting point it should make things easier.

Anyway I think an obvious substitution u = x + y which converts to the lines u = 1 and u = 2. But how about the 'v' substitution? I have accounted for the lines y = -x + 1 and y = -x + 2 with the u substitution but there are also the sides of R given by the equations y = 0 and x = 0. I cannot figure out a suitable substitution. Can someone please help me with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benny said:
Firstly, I would like to ask when attempting questions requiring a change of variables, is the priority to make the region of integration simpler or the integrand simpler? I ask this because I am often not sure how to approach these sorts of questions so if I have the correct starting point it should make things easier.

The two questions are intertwined. You of course want the integrand to be easy to integrate, but once you perform that first integration your choice of region influences your integrand. I don't know of any general procedure for determining the region that will best facilitate integration. Experience seems to be the best guide. Mind you, I am trained not as a mathematician, but as a physicist. But as my old calculus teacher always said, "Differentiation is mechanics, integration is art."

Anyway I think an obvious substitution u = x + y which converts to the lines u = 1 and u = 2.

Good start!

But how about the 'v' substitution? I have accounted for the lines y = -x + 1 and y = -x + 2 with the u substitution but there are also the sides of R given by the equations y = 0 and x = 0. I cannot figure out a suitable substitution. Can someone please help me with that?

In this case: Let the integrand be your guide. Inside that cosine function you've got a rational function. You already used the denominator as one substitution. Why not let the numerator give you the other one?

Let v=y-x. It should come out pretty easy that way.

Let us know if you get stuck again.
 
Thanks for your explanations Tom. It's been a few days since I posted this question and during that time I've had a look at some other questions from the same section of the book. I've noticed that the integrands and the regions are set up so that the form of the integrand pretty much gives away the required substitutions. I asked about a procedure to do these sorts of problems because I think that in many cases it doesn't always turn out so well. Anyway thanks again for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K