Double integral conversion to polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a double integral into polar coordinates, specifically focusing on the integration of a function defined over a quarter circle in the upper left quadrant. The original poster describes their setup and boundaries for the integral, attempting to visualize the problem and apply polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct setup of the integral in polar coordinates, questioning the substitution of variables and the limits of integration. There are attempts to clarify the separation of variables and the order of integration, with some participants suggesting different approaches to evaluate the integral.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts to clarify the integration process and the handling of limits. Some participants provide guidance on integrating with respect to different variables and confirm the correctness of trigonometric identities used in the integration. There is an ongoing exploration of methods without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating functions in polar coordinates, with specific attention to the boundaries and the nature of the integrand. There are indications of confusion regarding the integration order and the treatment of variables within the integrand.

ProPatto16
Messages
323
Reaction score
0
i have no idea how to use the functions on here to ill try my best.

[tex]\int[/tex](upper bound a lower bound 0)[tex]\int[/tex](upper bound 0 lower bound -sqrt(a2-y2) of the function x2y.dxdy

firstly trying to map it out...

i think its the quarter circle in the top left quadrant with boundaries 0 to a along y-axis and boundaries 0 to -sqrt(a2-y2) along -ve x-axis.

assuming that is right, and x=rcos[tex]\theta[/tex] amd y=rsin[tex]\theta[/tex] so then the function needing to be integrated is (r2cos2[tex]\theta[/tex]*rsin[tex]\theta[/tex])rdrd[tex]\theta[/tex]

the radius r is equal to a so sub in for r and integrate the function and all that. is that the right track??

sorry if its hard to understand :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ProPatto16! :smile:

(have an integral: ∫ and a theta: θ and a square-root: √ :wink:)
ProPatto16 said:
… the radius r is equal to a so sub in for r and integrate the function and all that. is that the right track??

you were doing fine down to (r2cos2θ*rsinθ)rdrdθ :smile:

but no, you can't sub in a for r, you have to integrate wrt r, and then put r = a (and 0) :wink:
 
Oh. That's going to be a long integration -.-
Thank you sir!
 
so do you meanbelow? (click on it to see tex code)
[tex]\int_0^a \int_0^{-\sqrt{y^2-a^2}}dxdy x^2y[/tex]
 
The second integral sign, swap those bounds around and swap a and y in the square root. But otherwise yes! Jealous much!
 
ProPatto16 said:
Oh. That's going to be a long integration -.-

nooo … two short integrations :biggrin:

you can split it up into two separate integrals, one over r and one over θ. :wink:
 
But I thought to do that you had to have both integrating variables separate? The variable r is in both functions and cannot be factored out of either?

Or do you mean integrate with respect to r then respect to theta?
 
ProPatto16 said:
But I thought to do that you had to have both integrating variables separate? The variable r is in both functions and cannot be factored out of either?

No, the integrand is a product (which can be separated), and the limits are independent …

what are the limits? :wink:
 
Limits are 0 and a for one and the other one limits are 0 and the -ve root thing?
 
  • #10
nooo :redface: … the other one is for θ

what are the limits for θ ? :smile:
 
  • #11
Intuitively, it would have to be between pi/2 and pi?
 
  • #12
ProPatto16 said:
Intuitively, it would have to be between pi/2 and pi?

Why "intuitively" ? :confused:

Yes, π/2 ≤ θ ≤ π …

the whole point of changing variables was to get the r and θ limits independent of each other! :smile:
 
  • #13
Intuition says for the quarter circle to be in upper left quadrant then that would have to be range of theta? Haha. Maybe not the right word. But made my point. And so then the integrand in respect to theta is evaluated with those bounds?
 
  • #14
yes!

sooo … ? :smile:
 
  • #15
So integrate with respect to theta then sub in bounds then integrate the solution with respect to r and sub in a?
Which would give a numerical answer multiplied by a?
 
  • #16
ProPatto16 said:
Which would give a numerical answer multiplied by a?

Do it and see! :smile:

(in fact, do it both ways …

integrate wrt θ first, then r, then try integrating wrt r first, then θ :wink:)​
 
  • #17
okay. i just typed up a huge long reply took me 45min and then i went to post and the page expired! so now I am soooo angry I am just going to go through it quick and hope you understand.

first thing. I am integrating wrt theta first, then r.

second thing, the integral of cos2theta.

integral of cos2x is 0.5x + 0.25sin(2x) so do i just replace the x with theta giving 0.5+0.25sin(2theta)? i will continue on having done that.

from there first i multiplied through the extra r that is in the end and then integrated wrt theta to get:

[(r3(0.5+0.25sin(2theta)))*(-r2cos(theta)] between pi and pi/2

evaluating that gives [(r3)(0.5)(r2), since some of the trig things are 0... which then becomes 0.5r5

now integrate that between a and 0

gives [r6/12] then just sub in the a giving a final answer of a6/12


the only two questions in that are can i multiply the r through at the start of do i have to do it during each integration?
and is that expression for cos2theta correct?
 
  • #18
"At the start or* do I have to.."
Wouldn't let me edit.
 
  • #19
Hi ProPatto16! :smile:
ProPatto16 said:
the only two questions in that are can i multiply the r through at the start of do i have to do it during each integration?
and is that expression for cos2theta correct?

Yes, cos2x = (1 + cos2x)/2, so the integral is x/2 + (sin2x)/4 + constant :smile:

I'm not sure what you mean about the r, but if you try integrating the other way round (wrt r first, then θ), you'll see that you get the same result. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K