Drag force of a spherical BB ammo under water

AI Thread Summary
BB ammo was shot into a water-filled tank for an experiment, with recorded data used to calculate instantaneous velocity using Logger Pro. The drag force equation was applied, with water density and reference area kept constant, leading to a calculated low velocity of 0.7-3 m/s and a Reynolds number of about 0.03. Theoretical drag coefficient for a spherical object is 0.47, but the low Reynolds number suggests variability in the drag coefficient. The experimenter is uncertain about calculating drag force using mass and deceleration, and whether Stokes' Law applies due to the low Reynolds number. The focus is on the drag experienced by the bullet upon entering the water, while ignoring pre-entry dynamics.
Xenekaro
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Basically, BB ammos were shot from an airsoft gun into a water filled tank. The experiment was recorded using a video camera. I can calculate the approximate instantaneous velocity of the bullet under water at a given time using Logger Pro.

1. Relevant equations

Drag force = 0.5 ρAC0v2

2. Homework Statement I have kept the density of water, ρ and the reference area, A constant.
ρ of water = 997kg/m3
A = ∏ rsq. ( r = 0.003 m)
I want to calculate Coefficient of drag of a spherical ammo to find a relationship between velocity and drag coefficient.
Secondly, the velocity of the BB ammos under water that I calculated using Logger Pro indicates a very low velocity of about 0.7-3m/s (0.2 seconds after under water). The Reynolds number comes to about 0.03

The Attempt at a Solution


I have searched online and found that the theoretical drag coefficient of a spherical object should be 0.47.
The low Reyonlds Number indicates that the drag coefficient is not constant.
I am facing difficulty because I have two unknown variables, Drag force and Cd.

Another question: Can the drag force be calculated by Mass * deceleration.
I know the mass to be 0.12g and can calculate the deceleration of the bullet...

I am also not sure if Strokes Law may apply to this experiment because the Reynolds number is really low.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The context of your question is difficult to decipher.

Is this just a make-believe homework problem where we are to pretend no cavitation is involved or is it more realistic?

Was there a real experiment? Was there cavitation?
 
Real experiment. For my Independent research lab for IB Physics HL.

Yes there was cavitation-if u mean splash. But I am trying to ignore the physics of the bullet before or at the point of striking water. I want to concentrate only at the time when the bullet enters water and experiences drag.

I am kind of late for submittal so I don't want to ask my teacher. I did most my lab writeup with the assumption that Force of drag is Mass*deceleration. But I just realized that is unlikely. Please help :)
 
I'm skeptical about your Reynolds number.

In SAE units at a speed of 1 m/s = 3.281 ft/sec:

Re = rho * D * V/mu = 62.4 * .177/12 * 3.28 * 3600/2.37 = 4586

Viscosity of saturated water at 70 F = 2.37 lbm/ft-hr
 
cavitation does not mean splash
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top