E-field, force, & changing sign of charge (grade 12)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field and force experienced by a charge at a specific point. The net electric field was determined to be 6.7 x 10^4 N/C at an angle of 63° north of east. The force on a charge of -1.2 x 10^-5 C was calculated to be 0.80 N directed south-west. It was clarified that if the charge changes signs, the force's magnitude remains the same, but its direction reverses due to the nature of electric forces. The calculations and reasoning presented were confirmed as correct, emphasizing the importance of understanding vector components in electric field analysis.
krbs
Messages
51
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


a) Find the net electric field at a point
b) Find the net force experienced by a charge of -1.2 x 10-5 C placed at that point
c) What would happen if the charge changed signs?

Homework Equations


FE = qε

The Attempt at a Solution


a) Solved: 6.7 x 104 N/C [E 63° N]

b) FE = (6.7 x 104 N/C)(1.2 x 10-5 C)
= 0.80 N [S 27° W]

I'm not sure about this. I think I'm only supposed to take the magnitude of the charge into account, and figure out directions after? Also am I correct to use the net field I've already calculated?

c) The magnitude of the force would remain the same, but the directions would swap since the positive charge is being attracted rather than repelled (0.80 N [E 63° N]).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
krbs said:
I'm not sure about this. I think I'm only supposed to take the magnitude of the charge into account, and figure out directions after?
You can do that, or you could separate the field vector into individual components (East and North, corresponding to X and Y components in a Cartesian coordinate system), then compute the force components individually, recombining the resulting components into your "geographical polar" form afterwards.

krbs said:
Also am I correct to use the net field I've already calculated?
Presumably so, although without seeing the rest of the problem statement we can only assume that your field is correct.

krbs said:
c) The magnitude of the force would remain the same, but the directions would swap since the positive charge is being attracted rather than repelled (0.80 N [E 63° N]).
If by "swap" you mean a 180° direction change, then yes.

You probably don't want to use "attracted rather than repelled" as a descriptor since that implies an object to which something is attracted or repelled. Here, as far as we can tell from the information you've supplied, there's just a field in space without a source being defined.
 
  • Like
Likes krbs
Thanks for your response. I'll add the missing info.

a) Calculate the net electric field at point A for each of the following charge distributions.

IMG_3288.JPG


Ex = (9.0 x 109 Nm2/C2)(3.0 x 10-5 C)/(3.0m)2
= 3.0 x 104 N/C [East]

Ey = (9.0 x 109 Nm2/C2)(6.0 x 10-5 C)/(3.0m)2
= 6.0 x 104 N/C [North]

Enet2 = (3.0 x 104)2 + (6.0 x 104)2
Enet = 6.7 x 104 N/C

θ = tan-1(6.0 x 104/3.0 x 104)
= 63°
∴ Enet = 6.7 x 104 N/C [E 63° N]
gneill said:
You can do that, or you could separate the field vector into individual components (East and North, corresponding to X and Y components in a Cartesian coordinate system), then compute the force components individually, recombining the resulting components into your "geographical polar" form afterwards.

Alright, I think I understand.

c) The direction of the force experience by the particle at point A would change directions because the negative charge to the east is now attracting rather than repelling the charge, as is the negative charge to the north of point A. The new net force is therefore 0.80 N [E 63° N].
 
That looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes krbs
Thank you
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top