E&M - Electric Field Intensity in Microwave

AngelofMusic
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This problem has me stumped and I keep thinking that I'm missing something simple. The question gives us a simple model for modelling a microwave. We consider a plane wave traveling through an object in the microwave (in the z direction), with no reflection.

So, the general form should be; E(z) = E_0e^{-yz}

We are given that the waves radiate 500W of power at f = 2 GHz in a cylindrical volume with radius r=4. The object has an outer layer 5mm thick. We are also given \epsilon_r and \mu_r. And we have to find the peak electric field intensity at the top of the surface.

Any ideas where to start on this one? I assume it's asking for E0, but I don't know what theorems I should apply to get that one. Maxwell's equations only give me the general solution I posted above. I tried doing boundary conditions, but that didn't get me anywhere either. I have a feeling it may have something to do with the power and the frequency, and possibly the Poynting Theorem. And maybe I should integrate P = 1/2 \int |E|^2 dV over the cylindrical volume and set P = 500 W?

Am I on the right track? Thanks for any help you can offer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it sounds like you are on the right track. You can use the Poynting theorem to calculate the power density, and then set it equal to 500 W over the cylindrical volume. This should give you an equation for E0. From there, you can use the general solution you posted above, E(z) = E_0e^{-yz}, to find the peak electric field intensity at the top of the surface.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top