Effective potential of a particle sliding on an inclined rod

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Hey guys,

Here is the question:

A pointlike mass m can slide along a rigid rod of length l and negligible mass. One extremity of the rod is fixed at the origin O of an inertial system (x,y,z), and the rod forms a constant angle α with the z-axis. The rod rotates about the z-axis with constant angular velocity ω. Gravity acts in the negative z-direction.

(i) How many degrees of freedom does the system have?

(ii) Write down the Lagrangian and the Lagrange equations.

(ii) Recast the system as a 1-dimensional motion in an effective potential. Find an expression for the effective potential and determine the equilibrium positions as well as their stability

Homework Equations


T=1/2mv^{2}
Lagrangian: L = T - V
Lagrange Equation: \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q}

The Attempt at a Solution


Here are my solutions:

(i) one degree of freedom - the distance from the origin to the point mass. call this distance r.

(ii) I won't put the calculations here, I'll just give my results:

Lagrangian L = T - V = \frac{1}{2}m[\dot{r}^{2}+r^{2}ω^{2}sin^{2}α] - mgrcosα


Lagrange equation: \ddot{r}-rω^{2}sin^{2}α + gcosα = 0

(iii)

Okay, so here is the issue. How do you get the effective potential from this? and do I just differentiate that to get the equilibrium positions and then differentiate again to determine stability?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, so here is the issue. How do you get the effective potential from this?
If you had a particle of mass m confined to 1-dimension of space (a straight line) and you let r be the distance from the origin, how would you express the kinetic energy T? How would you construct a potential energy function V(r) for this particle so that it would have the same Lagrangian L as your three-dimensional problem of the particle on the rotating wire?

and do I just differentiate that to get the equilibrium positions and then differentiate again to determine stability?
Sounds good.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top