Electric Charge Equilibrium Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude of a third charge needed for static equilibrium in a system with two point charges, q and 4q, separated by distance L. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing free body diagrams and setting up equations based on the forces acting on each charge. The equations involve balancing the forces between the charges and incorporating the distances from the third charge to the others. Despite attempts to simplify the problem, confusion arises regarding the distances and the correct approach to solve for the unknown charge. Ultimately, the participants express uncertainty about their calculations and seek clarification on their methodology.
Goldenwind
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Electric Charge

Homework Statement


Two point charges q and 4 q are distance L apart and free to move. A third charge is placed so that the entire three-charge system is in static equilibrium. What is the magnitude of the third charge?

Homework Equations


F = kq1q2 / r^2
k ~= 8.988x10^9

The Attempt at a Solution


Not a clue. All I've figured out is that for this to work in perfect equilibrium, the third charge must be directly in between the first two.

Not looking for an all-out solution from anyone (Although that'd be cool too), but more looking for just a push in the right direction.

In theory, it'd involve drawing free body diagrams for the three charges, and then working with the charge q3 to balance the equilibrium... but I can't grasp my head around that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Goldenwind said:
In theory, it'd involve drawing free body diagrams for the three charges, and then working with the charge q3 to balance the equilibrium... but I can't grasp my head around that.
yes! just need to go ahread and write down some simultaneous equations and solve them... obviously the variables will be the charge for the unknown/3rd particle, and its distances from each one.
 
Particle 3:
Net Force = 0 = F1 + F2
-F1 = F2

-kq1q3/(r13)^2 = kq2q3/(r23)^2
The problem here is that I don't know the distance between 1 and 3, or between 2 and 3.
Also, the q3 cancels out on each side. /boggle
 
also need equations for particle 1 and 2, all particles must have net force add to zero, since particle 3 is in between the two, the the two distances (13, 23) should add to L which gives u another equation... I haven't solved this, but that's how you go about it.
 
Particle 1:
Net Force = 0 = F2 + F3
-F2 = F3

-kq1q2 / L^2 = kq1q3 / (r13)^2
-4q / L^2 = q3 / (r13)^2

Particle 2:
Net Force = 0 = F1 + F3
-F3 = F1 (Doing it the other way, since the force would be in the other direction)

-kq2q3 / (r23)^2 = kq1q2 / L^2
-q3 / (r23)^2 = q / L^2

L = r13 + r23
r13 = L - r23

-4q / L^2 = q3 / (L - r23)^2
Unsure where to go from here. Could simplify the above line a little, but then I'd still have two unknowns: q3 and r23.

Wait, I have an idea..
-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L = r23
Which means:
r13 = L - r23
r13 = Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q)

Then from the particle 3 formula... plugging in r13 and r23...
-q3/(r13)^2 = 4q3/(r23)^2
-q3/(Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q))^2 = 4q3/(-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L)^2
-1/(Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q))^2 = 4/(-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L)^2
-((q3*L^2) / -4q) = ((-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L)^2) / 4
q3*L^2/q = ((-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L)^2)

Just checking, am I on the right path? Computing the right side is going to be a HUGE mess, I don't want to do it if I'm already doing things wrong.
 
I haven't checked the last bit but once you have got those equations it is just a matter of solving them... and method of substition seems to be the way to go.. so you are on right track
 
Sigh... here goes nothing.

q3*L^2/q = (-Sqrt((q3*L^2) / -4q) + L)^2
q3*L^2/q = 2L^2 - q3*L^2/4q3
q3*L^2/q = 2L^2 - L^2/4
q3/q = 2 - 1/4
q3 = 2q - 1/4q
q3 = 8/4q - 1/4q
q3 = 7/4q
q3 = 1.75q

Trying this result...
Incorrect.
 
I just want to point out that I'm almost completely certain that the mistake is mine somewhere along the line. Just saying that the answer I came up with happened to be incorrect, not saying that your advice is off or that. I do appreciate you helping me at this ungodly hour.
 
I can't see where you've gone wrong, but it is.
It may be easier to first solve for L concentrating on the added particle.
 
  • #10
Goldenwind said:
I just want to point out that I'm almost completely certain that the mistake is mine somewhere along the line. Just saying that the answer I came up with happened to be incorrect, not saying that your advice is off or that. I do appreciate you helping me at this ungodly hour.

ungodly hour? :smile:

Couldn't you see my Avatar?
:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top