Electric Field and Flux: Calculations and Explanations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field and flux for a nonconducting sphere with a positive charge density and point charges in proximity. For part a, the electric field at point P, located outside the sphere, is determined to be E = (Qa)/(4πR^3ε₀), directed away from the sphere. In part b, the electric flux through a spherical surface centered at C and passing through P is calculated as (Qa^3)/(R^3ε₀). The conversation also touches on the contributions of point charges to electric flux and fields, emphasizing the differences in their effects based on Gauss' theorem. The participants are encouraged to share diagrams for clarity and confirm their calculations.
harmonicmotion
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
1.





A nonconducting sphere with center C and radius a has a spherically symmetric electric charge density. The total charge of the object is Q > 0.
a. Determine the magnitude and direction of the electric field at point P, which is a distance R > a to the right of the sphere's center.

b. Determine the flux of the electric field through the spherical surface centered at C and passing through P.








A point particle of charge Q is now placed a distance R below point P. as shown above.

c. Determine the magnitude and direction of the electric field at point P.








d. Now consider four point charges, q1, q2, q3, and q4, that lie in the plane of the page as shown in the diagram above. Imagine a three dimensional closed surface whose cross section in the plane of the page is indicated.
i. Which of these charges contribute to the net electric flux through the surface?

ii. Which of these charges contribute to the electric field at point P1 ?

iii. Are your answers to i and ii the same or are they different? Explain why this is so.

e. If the net charge enclosed by a surface is zero, does this mean that the field is zero at all points on the surface? Justify your answer.

f. If the field is zero at all points on a surface, does this mean there is no net charge enclosed by the surface? Justify your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i was wondering if someone could help me with this problem
 
What are your thoughts so far? Does Gauss' theorem say anything useful? Hint: yes.

Also, the questions refer to diagrams that nobody but you can see. You ought to find a way to share them.
 
For a) i got E= (Qa)/(4piR^3*epsilon naught) away from the sphere
for b) i got (Qa^3)/(R^3*epsilon naught)

is that right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top