Electric field at center of semi-circular bent rod of charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of a semicircular rod with a uniform charge. The user correctly derives the expression for the electric field but encounters confusion regarding the direction, noting that the result is negative despite the rod being positively charged. They clarify that the vertical components of the electric field cancel out, leaving only the horizontal components to consider. The user questions the value of 'r' in their final expression and seeks confirmation on whether the correct formula should involve L squared instead of r. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector components and the geometry involved in electric field calculations.
caesius
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have the correct answer just the wrong direction

Homework Statement


A uniformly charged insulating rod of length 14.0cm is bent into the shape of a semicircle as shown in figure XXX. The rod has a total charge of 7.5 micro C. Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at P, the center of the semicircle.


Homework Equations



dE = k.dq.1/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I set things up like this
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/4690/physprobub2.png

Since the vertical components would cancel I just looked at the x components.

<br /> dE_{x} = \frac{k_{e}\cdot dq\cdot\sin\theta}{r^2} <br />

<br /> = \frac{k_{e}\cdot dx\cdot\lambda\cdot\sin\theta}{r^2} \ \ \mbox{as dq = dx\cdot\lambda}<br />

<br /> = \frac{k_{e}\cdot r\cdot d\theta\cdot\lambda\cdot\sin\theta}{r^2} \ \ \mbox{as dx = ds = r\cdot d\theta}<br />

<br /> = \frac{k_{e}\cdot d\theta\cdot\lambda\cdot\sin\theta}{r} \ \ \mbox{as dx = ds = r\cdot d\theta}<br />

So
<br /> E = \frac{k_{e}\cdot \lambda}{r} \int d\theta\cdot\sin\theta}<br />
(integral is from zero to pi)

<br /> E = \frac{k_{e}\cdot \lambda}{r} ( -1 - 1)<br />

<br /> E = \frac{-2\cdot k_{e}\cdot Q}{L\cdot r} \ \ \mbox{as \lambda = \frac{Q}{L}}<br />
When I substitute the values is I get the correct answer but it's negative. The bent rod is positive so the resultant electric field should be AWAY from the semicircle and therefor positve?!?

What have I done wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral of sin from 0 to pi is 2. How did you get (-1-1)? BTW the antiderivative of sin(x) is -cos(x).
 
Sorry for reactivating this old thread, but I figured better that than starting a whole new thread.

I have gotten to the point of <br /> <br /> E = \frac{2\cdot k_{e}\cdot Q}{L\cdot r} \ <br /> <br />

but now my question is what is the r value? Of what my reasoning is telling me, it should be <br /> <br /> E = \frac{2\cdot k_{e}\cdot Q}{L^{2}} \ <br />

Is this right? Can anyone assist me?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top