Electric field-boundary conditions question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abdulwahab Hajar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions Electric
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a question arises regarding the surface charge density at the interface of two lossy dielectric media with given dielectric constants and conductivities. The initial assumption is that the surface charge density should be zero due to the nature of dielectrics, but the solution manual indicates otherwise. It explains that the normal components of electric flux densities across the boundary lead to a discontinuity in the electric field, suggesting the presence of surface polarization charge density. The discussion emphasizes the need to compute this polarization charge density using the provided electric field value. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the presence of a non-zero surface charge density is consistent with the boundary conditions for electric fields in dielectrics.
Abdulwahab Hajar
Messages
56
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two lossy homogeneous dielectric media with dielectric constans ϵrl = 2, ϵr2 = 3 and conductivities a1= 15 (mS), σ2 = 10 (ms) are in contact at the z = 0 plane. in the Z>0 region a uniform electric field E1 = 20i - 50k
exists (i and k being unit vectors in the x and z directions)..
Ok so my question is this in one of the parts of the question it asks for the surface charge density on the interface, however since both media are dielectric shouldn't the surface charge density be 0 according to the boundary conditions of electric fields

Homework Equations


D1n - D2n = Ps (surface charge density)
where D1n - D2n are the normal components of the electric flux densities of media 1 and 2 respectively

The Attempt at a Solution


the way I see it, and according to what is stated in the textbook Ps should be 0, however the solution manual states differently
 
Physics news on Phys.org
## \nabla \cdot D=\rho_{free} ## gives (by Gauss' law) ## \int D \cdot \, dA =Q_{free} =0 ## because there is no free electrical charge. The ## D ## integral gives ## -\epsilon_1 E_1+\epsilon_2 E_2=0 ## This means that the electric field is discontinuous across the boundary. They are apparently providing you with the value of ## E_1 ##. From the equation ## \int E \cdot \, dA=\frac{Q_{total}}{\epsilon_o}=\frac{Q_p}{\epsilon_o} ## (since ## Q_{total}=Q_{free}+Q_p ## with ## Q_{free}=0 ##), you should be able to compute the surface polarization charge density ## \sigma_p ##. They don't supply any units on the electric field ## E_1 ## but I would presume you can assume units of Newtons/Coulomb=Volts/meter.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top