Electric field due to uniform charged line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P, located 5 cm from the end of a uniformly charged line of 10 cm with a total charge of 2x10^-4 C. The problem is approached in four steps, starting with determining the charge of individual segments when divided into 100 equal parts. The second step involves calculating the distances from the first and last charges to point P, which are 15 cm and 5 cm, respectively. The main challenge arises in the third step, where the user struggles to express the distance between neighboring charges in a linear function format. The conversation highlights the need for a clear function to represent the distances as part of the electric field calculation process.
muaymike
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the electric field at point p 5cm away from a 10cm line with a uniform charge of 2x10^-4C.
so its uniformly charged from 0 - 10cm and then point p is at 15cm



This question is broken down into 4 step by step parts:

first is to consider 100 individual charges equally spaced apart and determine what the charge of each would be to get a total of 2x10^-4C

Next one asks what is the distance from the first charge to our point p, and distance from last charge to point p

The third one is where I'm stuck, it asks what is the distance between the neighboring charges. write an expression for distance rn from the nth charge to point p.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For the first part, the charges would have 2/100 x 10^-4 C each. The second part, the distance from the first to point p is 15cm and from the last to p is 5cm. The third part, I can't find a way to express this distance. I believe it should have a dr but it could be just 15-xn. I am really drawing a blank right now
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you label the first one with n=1 and the last one with n=100, you need a function f(n) such that f(1)=5cm and f(100)=15cm.
As the distance between all points is the same, this function is linear...

(a different, easier problem: what would you with just three points, if the first point is at 5cm and the third point at 15cm?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top