Electric field in a conductor with an internal cavity

Silversonic
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
I'm not entirely sure if this is meant to be in the "advanced physics" section, it's for my undergraduate degree anyway.

Homework Statement



A conducting sphere of radius R, carries a total charge of q. It is surrounded by an electrically neutral conducting shell with an inner radius, a, and outer radius, b.

[PLAIN]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/7357/59847545.png

What is the electric field in the region R < r < a?

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused on whether there is or isn't an electric field. I've already answered the question asking me to find the electric field for r < R and a < r < b as zero due to Gauss' law (the Gaussian surface requires and electric field of 0 to pass through it). But I'm confused about this one between the sphere and the conducting shell. I am pretty sure that there is an electric field (it's the region between positive and negative charges, why wouldn't there be?), but if there was, how would I calculate it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an electric field in that region and you'd solve it like any other Gauss's law problem. Pick your surface, find how much charge is enclosed.

What surface would you pick?
 
Feldoh said:
There is an electric field in that region and you'd solve it like any other Gauss's law problem. Pick your surface, find how much charge is enclosed.

What surface would you pick?

Understood, thanks :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top