Electric Field Intensity. Finite sheet of charge.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field intensity due to a finite sheet of charge with a specific charge density in the z=0 plane. The problem involves determining the electric field at a point above the sheet and includes various mathematical expressions and attempts at integration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differences in x- and y-dependence of the charge density and question the symmetry of the problem. There are attempts to derive the electric field components through integration, with some participants expressing confusion over the results and the equations used.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and suggestions for visualizing the charge distribution. There is recognition of the importance of understanding the integration process, and some guidance has been provided regarding the components of the electric field and the relevance of the charge density function.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential challenges with the problem, including the need for careful consideration of the charge density and the mathematical steps involved in the integration. There is also mention of the constraints imposed by homework rules and the complexity of the problem as it relates to a specific textbook exercise.

azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A finite sheet of charge, of density ρ=2x(x2+y2+4)^3/2, lies in the z=0 plane for 0≤x≤2m and 0≤y≤2m.Determine E at (0,0,2)m

Ans:(18x10^9)(-16/3ax-4ay+8az)

Homework Equations


E=kQ/R2

The Attempt at a Solution


dE=ρdA / R^2 aR
dA=dxdy[/B]

E=k 2x(x2+y2+4)^3/2 dy dx (-xax-yay+2az ) /x2+y2+4)^3/2

E=k∫∫ 2x dy dx (-xax-yay+2az)

E=(18x10^9)(-4ax-4ay+8az)

How x and y component of E are different in the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you see a difference between the x- and the y-dependence of ##\rho## ?

Or: Can you see x = y is not a symmetry line ?
ChargeDist.jpg


(edit: forgot the +4 in the first upload)

Once again: making a drawing is soooooo useful !
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: azizlwl
Thanks for the visual. Is there method to find a point of symmetry on that surface?
 
What if there isn't ?
 
BvU said:
What if there isn't ?
Do I have to use mathematical theorem? If so I have to give up on this problem. I know how to use Coulomb law and multiple integration with help of Mathematica. This question no 2.50 from Schaum's Electromagnetics.
 
Ah, didn't really read the small print :smile: and just answered the question "How x and y component of E are different in the answer?". So now it's time to go through your steps and see why you and Schaum end up with different answers.
Let me please use ##\hat\imath,\ \hat \jmath ,## and ##\hat k## instead of ##a_x, a_y, a_z## as Cartesian unit vectors.

Stumble on the first step:
Your relevant equation only describes ##|\vec E|\ ##, so it doesn't help you find the components.
Google (or look up in Schaum) the right equation and look at it carefully: the only vector that determines the direction of ##|\vec E|\ ## in there is ##\vec r-\vec r'## and you can't take it out of the integral because it varies with ##d\vec r' = dx dy##.

Attempt at solution starts with
azizlwl said:
E=k∫∫ 2x(x2+y2+4)^3/2 dy dx (-xax-yay+2az ) /x2+y2+4)^3/2
which does not match with
azizlwl said:
dE=ρdA / R2 aR
(it looks to me that even the brackets don't match...)

My advice: Don't give up. This exercise is very important for your understanding and further curriculum. Make a drawing that shows ##\ \vec E\ ## at ##(0,0,2)## due to a small patch of charge ##\rho dxdy## located at ##\vec r' = (x, y)## in the x,y plane. You will see that the maker of the exercise chose a very nice expression for ##\rho##.

The consider what you have to integrate to find the x-component of ##\vec E##, ##\ \vec E_x = \vec E \cdot \hat\imath \ ##, and remember that you can bring constant factors into the integral. Then idem the y component and the z-component.

Sounds perhaps a bit cryptic. But you should really work this out yourself - if I do it for you it does not help you. So try a first step and post when you get stuck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: azizlwl
Nice of you to like my post. I hope it's for the encouragement, because I am far too critical about your contents. Let me repair the expression with an extra bracket and look at it again... :rolleyes:
 
OK, so it's all pretty minor. You're doing great and the only glitch is for the x component. All my well-intended teaching blabla doesn't help if you do the ##Ey = k\iint 2xy\, dx dy ## completely correctly and all you are missing is the ##Ex = k\iint 2x^2 \,dx dy ##. Look at this last one again and tell me it was in fact easy ! (and hopefully also that you could have done it without crutches like Mathematica (*) just as well !)

I did find a worked out example for the first few steps. Later on he brings ##\sigma = \rho## outside the integral because it's constant -- you can't do that, but thanks to the nice ##\rho## function you could do other things to get simple integrals...and you did. It was just the last step that went off the rails a little bit.

(*) I have nothing against Mathematica, but here it's just like using a calculator for 2 x 3
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: azizlwl
Thanks. My fault is on the unit vector. I used to deal with constant z component.
So the unit vector should be (- xi - yj+2k)/|R|. Maybe using aa, ay and az is confusing.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K