Electric Field of a Finite Cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field along the axis of a finite cylindrical slab with a radial symmetry and charge distribution. Participants emphasize the need to start with Coulomb's Law and integrate the charge density over the volume of the cylinder, but express uncertainty about handling the height integration when the charge is not located on the axis. There is mention of the electric field for a disk of charge, but the challenge lies in incorporating height dependence into the calculations. Clarifications are sought regarding the definition of variables and whether the electric field is needed for points inside or outside the slab. The conversation highlights the complexities of integrating over a finite geometry in electrostatics.
wxguy28
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive expressions for electric field produced along the axis of radial symmetry for an H km thick cylindrical slab of radius R with charge distributed around the volume. Then, give the electric field on the vertical axis for four of these cylindrical slabs.

Homework Equations


Obviously start with Coloumb's Law (q/4*pi*ε0*r2). Must integrate from there.

The Attempt at a Solution


As this isn't for an infinite cylinder, we can't use a Gaussian surface. Knowing that q = ρV where rho is the charge density and V = ∏R2, I've come up with:

ρ/4ε0 ∫∫∫ R2h2/r2

However, I'm not sure how to integrate through the heights of the cylinder in the case if the charge is not found on the axis. I know this is a vague attempt at the answer up to this point, but I'm honestly just not sure how to do the height part of the integration. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have found the E-field for a disk of charge, that being (2∏ρ/ε0)(1-[r/√r2+R2])

However there is no height dependence here. Is it has simple as integrating over some dh term from h1 to h2?
 
God damn it, I am dealing with the same problem.
 
wxguy28 said:
I have found the E-field for a disk of charge, that being (2∏ρ/ε0)(1-[r/√r2+R2])

However there is no height dependence here. Is it has simple as integrating over some dh term from h1 to h2?
Yes, but be careful with r. How are you defining that?

Do you want the field inside the slab, outside the slab, or both?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top