Electric Fields x-component problem

AI Thread Summary
In the first quadrant, the x-component of the net electric field is always positive due to both x and y components being positive. In the third quadrant, the x-component is always negative as both components are negative. The discussion clarifies that while the uniform electric field contributes positively, the field from a charge can vary in magnitude and direction. The focus is on understanding the net electric field's behavior based on quadrant positioning. Overall, the rationale regarding the net electric field in both quadrants is confirmed with some corrections on the influence of charge fields.
masamune
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1) In the first quadrant (x > 0, y > 0), the x-component of the net electric field is:

always positive.
always negative.
sometimes positive and sometimes negative.


2) In the third quadrant (x < 0, y < 0), the x-component of the net electric field is:

always positive.
always negative.
sometimes positive and sometimes negative.

For the first part, I explained that in the first quadrant, the x and y components of the field are both positive and so the net electric electric field will always be positive. Conversely, in the third quadrant, the x and y components of the field are always negative and so the net electric field will always be negative. Is my rationale correct? Refer to the attached pic btw if you have no clue what I'm talking about.
 

Attachments

  • showme.gif
    showme.gif
    1.3 KB · Views: 589
Physics news on Phys.org
Get in the habit of stating the problem clearly. I'm guessing that the picture is meant to show a positive charge Q placed in what was a uniform electric field in the +x direction? And the problem refers to the net field?
masamune said:
For the first part, I explained that in the first quadrant, the x and y components of the field are both positive and so the net electric electric field will always be positive.
All they ask about is the x-component, so that's all you need consider. But, yes, both contributions to the net field are positive, so your answer is correct.
Conversely, in the third quadrant, the x and y components of the field are always negative and so the net electric field will always be negative. Is my rationale correct?
No. The uniform field has a positive x-component, but the field from the charge is negative. But the magnitude of the field from the charge varies with distance. Think it over again.
 
sorry about that doc. you assumed correctly though. thanks for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top