What is the magnitude of each fixed charge in coulombs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnitude of fixed charges at the corners of a square that balance the weight of a suspended electron. The setup involves four positive charges exerting equal force on the electron, which is located 20 nm above the square's center. The participant uses vector analysis to determine the forces acting on the electron, noting that the horizontal components cancel due to symmetry. They derive a relationship between the electrostatic force and gravitational force to find the charge magnitude. Ultimately, the participant successfully resolves the problem with assistance from others in the thread.
Cisneros778
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four point charges, q, are fixed to the four corners of a square that is 13.1 cm on a side. An electron is suspended above a point at which its weight is balanced by the electrostatic force due to the four point charges, at a distance of 20 nm above the center of the square. (The square is horizontally flat, and the electron is suspended 20 nm vertically above the center of the square.) What is the magnitude of each fixed charge in coulombs?
___ C

What is the magnitude of each fixed charge as a multiple of the electron's charge?
___ e



Homework Equations



F = (k*q1*q2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is a net force of 0 for the electron, I assume that all q-charges are positive since they pull with equal force from all four directions. Since this is a 3-dimensional problem I use vectors when I calculate the forces on e(Fnet(x) = 0 , Fnet(y) = 0). When I try to break the forces on e up into vectors the angle that I get is 90 degrees. This somewhat makes sense since the distance of 20 nm is so small it can almost be negligible. I am not sure though, where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so it looks like you have a pyramid with gravity pulling the suspended electron down and 4 symmetrically placed charges at each corner of the base pushing it up. I don't see where the 90 degrees comes in.

Because of the symmetry the horizontal components of the four charges cancel out leaving only the vertical. You know how to calculate the force on the suspended charge from these 4 and you know how to calculate the force of gravity on it right.
 
Ok,

4*(k*q*e)/d - Me*g = 0
where d is the horizontal distance from a to e.
Am I correct here?
 
Sorry,
4*(k*q*e)*sin(theta)/d^2 - Me*g = 0
 
Cisneros778 said:

Homework Statement


Four point charges, q, are fixed to the four corners of a square that is 13.1 cm on a side. An electron is suspended above a point at which its weight is balanced by the electrostatic force due to the four point charges, at a distance of 20 nm above the center of the square. (The square is horizontally flat, and the electron is suspended 20 nm vertically above the center of the square.) What is the magnitude of each fixed charge in coulombs?
___ C

What is the magnitude of each fixed charge as a multiple of the electron's charge?
___ e

Homework Equations



F = (k*q1*q2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is a net force of 0 for the electron, I assume that all q-charges are positive since they pull with equal force from all four directions. Since this is a 3-dimensional problem I use vectors when I calculate the forces on e(Fnet(x) = 0 , Fnet(y) = 0). When I try to break the forces on e up into vectors the angle that I get is 90 degrees. This somewhat makes sense since the distance of 20 nm is so small it can almost be negligible. I am not sure though, where to go from here.

Consider the following right triangle. One leg is along the diagonal of the square, from one corner to the center of the square. The length of this leg is \displaystyle(\sqrt{2})\cdot6.55\ \text{ cm}. The other leg is vertical, from the center of the square, up to the electron. The length of this leg is 20 nm = 20×10-7 cm.

The very small angle at the vertex of the triangle located at a corner of the square, has a measure of about \displaystyle \theta=\frac{20\times10^{-7}}{6.55}\approx 3.0534351\times10^{-7}\text{ radians}\approx 1.74949^\circ\times10^{-5}\,. Thus the other acute angle, the one with its vertex at the location of the electron has a measure of ≈ 89.9999825051°. That's temptingly close to 90°, but don't round it off.

The vertical component of the Coulomb force is a tiny fraction of the total Coulomb force.
 
Thank you both for your help I figured it out.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top