Electric potential with charges

AI Thread Summary
To achieve zero potential difference at the unoccupied corners of a square with charges +4.0 µC and -6.0 µC at opposite corners, the charge at the intersection of the diagonals must be calculated. The potential from each charge is determined using the formula V = kq/r, where r is the distance from the charge to the corner. Instead of assuming an infinite radius, the side length of the square should be treated as a variable, allowing for the calculation of distances in terms of this length. The sum of the potentials from all three charges must equal zero to find the unknown charge. This approach will yield the necessary charge value in relation to the side length of the square.
canadianballa
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two charges are placed at the corners of a square. One charge, +4.0uC, is fixed to one corner and another, -6.0uC is fixed to the opposite corner. WHat charge would need to be placed at hte intersection of the diagonals of the square in order ot make the potential difference zero at each of the two unoccupied corners?


Homework Equations


V = kq/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Given that potential difference (or voltage) is calculated based on the formula above, can I just assume that the radius of this square is infinitely large and therefore V becomes zero and that the charge is some number that is much smaller than infinite?
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Canadianballa,

canadianballa said:

Homework Statement


Two charges are placed at the corners of a square. One charge, +4.0uC, is fixed to one corner and another, -6.0uC is fixed to the opposite corner. WHat charge would need to be placed at hte intersection of the diagonals of the square in order ot make the potential difference zero at each of the two unoccupied corners?


Homework Equations


V = kq/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Given that potential difference (or voltage) is calculated based on the formula above, can I just assume that the radius of this square is infinitely large and therefore V becomes zero and that the charge is some number that is much smaller than infinite?
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this. Please help.

No, I don't think that's what they want you to do here. Instead, let the side length of the square be some unknown distance d. If the side has length d, what is the potential from each of the three charges (4 uC, -6uC, and Q) at one of the unoccupied corners (using your equation)? (You'll need to find the distance, in terms of d, that each of the three charges is from the corner.) If the sum of those three terms has to be zero, then that will give you the unknown charge Q.
 
Let the side of the sqaure be s. Place one known charge on the y axis, the other on the x-axis of a coordinate system, and the unknown charge at the intersection of the square diaganols. V = Ed where E is the electric field produced by the point charge and d is the distance from the point charge. A zero potential exists when no net electric field is present. So, use the expression for determining the electric field at a square corner by the point charges of the two known and one unknown charges and solve for the unkown charge by setting the vector sum of the three electric fields equal to zero. Your answer will be in terms of s.
 
Thanks guys for your help. I'll work on solving it now and post the attempt in a bit.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top