Electrical nodal analysis, find current

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and nodal analysis in electrical circuits. Participants are attempting to analyze a specific node in a circuit involving resistors and voltage sources, focusing on current directions and calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding KCL and assumes the relationship i1 + i2 = i3 for currents at a specific node.
  • Another participant suggests that the direction of currents must be consistent when applying KCL, noting that mismatched assumptions about current directions can lead to incorrect equations.
  • A participant shares their calculated currents, indicating confusion about the signs of the results and how they relate to current flow direction.
  • There is a discussion about how to interpret the signs of calculated currents, with one participant explaining that if the assumed direction of a current differs from the indicated direction in the problem, the sign of that current should be changed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of KCL and the importance of consistent current direction assumptions. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the interpretation of current signs and flow directions, indicating that the discussion is not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on how to determine the correct signs for current flow or the implications of their calculations. There are unresolved questions about the assumptions made in the analysis and how they affect the results.

jshoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ive tried many things and can't seem to grasp the concept of KCL.i know the node I am looking for is between r1 & r3. i assumed i1+i2=i3. also looking for directions of currents.

V1=30v
V2=40v
R1=82
R2=68
R3=47
Vx = ?

Homework Equations


i1 + i2 + i3 = 0 ?

The Attempt at a Solution


(30-Vx)/82 + (Vx-40)/68 = Vx/147

anyone help me out with KCL and Nodal analysis? I've been trying for awhile and can't seem to wrap my head around it.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6284.jpg
    IMG_6284.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
jshoe said:

Homework Statement


ive tried many things and can't seem to grasp the concept of KCL.i know the node I am looking for is between r1 & r3. i assumed i1+i2=i3. also looking for directions of currents.

V1=30v
V2=40v
R1=82
R2=68
R3=47
Vx = ?


Homework Equations


i1 + i2 + i3 = 0 ?



The Attempt at a Solution


(30-Vx)/82 + (Vx-40)/68 = Vx/147

anyone help me out with KCL and Nodal analysis? I've been trying for awhile and can't seem to wrap my head around it.

The trick is to make sure that the current directions that you choose for the sum will satisfy KCL at the given node. If you write: i1 + i2 + i3 = 0 then there is a tacit assumption that either all the currents are assumed to be flowing into the node, or all are assumed to be flowing out of the node.

Now take a look at your next equation. The first term (30-Vx)/82 is making the assumption that it the current is directed INTO the node. The next term (Vx-40)/68 makes the opposite assumption for current direction (it's directed OUT of the node). Placing the last term on the right hand side effectively changes its sign, so Vx/147 implies a current flowing INTO the node. So one out of three currents is mismatched in direction if you want to satisfy i1 + i2 + i3 = 0.

A simple way to avoid such current direction problems is to apply a fixed procedure to writing the equation for the node:

1) Assume that all currents flow OUT of the node
2) Write all the terms on one side of the equation, setting the other to zero.

Step 1 is accomplished by always taking the node potential first in the terms, and subtracting the fixed offset from the reference:

(Vx - 30)/82 + (Vx - 40)/68 + Vx/147 = 0
 
thanx for the reply. i asked my professor same question and it is becoming a little clearer. however I am still a little confused on my results, current flow and polarities. my answers are:

i1= -20.6 mA
i2=-172 mA
i3= 193 mA

these answer match up in the back of the book however i1= 20.6 ?

so does i3 + i2 = -i1 ? is this how i would analyze my answer?

how do i determine my results for current flow direction?
how do i know which currents to switch from - to + ?
do + currents flow into node and - flow out of node ?
 
jshoe said:
thanx for the reply. i asked my professor same question and it is becoming a little clearer. however I am still a little confused on my results, current flow and polarities. my answers are:

i1= -20.6 mA
i2=-172 mA
i3= 193 mA

these answer match up in the back of the book however i1= 20.6 ?

so does i3 + i2 = -i1 ? is this how i would analyze my answer?

how do i determine my results for current flow direction?
how do i know which currents to switch from - to + ?
do + currents flow into node and - flow out of node ?

Well, it looks like you took my advice and solved for the currents assuming that they are all leaving node A. That means the assumed current directions are shown by arrows pointing away from node A along each branch. Now, if the problem has a particular direction indicated for any given current by which you are meant to judge the current, and the indicated direction happens to match your calculation assumptions then no problem, the calculated current signs match. If on the other hand the problem wants you to report the current as measured in the opposite direction, then you change the sign of your calculated result to match.

So for example, suppose the problem had certain currents and directions specified on the circuit diagram, but you solved mathematically with the assumption that all currents flow out of the node:

attachment.php?attachmentid=52745&stc=1&d=1352325430.gif


Note that the calculated current i1 has the opposite direction from the current label in the problem diagram, while the other currents match in direction. That means you change the sign on your calculated value for i1 to match the diagram and leave i2 and i3 alone because they already match.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.9 KB · Views: 674

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 187 ·
7
Replies
187
Views
59K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K