Electrical Potential Energy of three quark system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrical potential energy of a subsystem of two "up" quarks within a proton, which consists of three quarks with specific charges. The initial confusion arises from mixing potential energy and electric potential formulas, leading to incorrect calculations. The correct approach involves using the total electrical potential energy formula while ensuring that the signs of the charges are accurately accounted for. A key point highlighted is the importance of including charge signs in calculations, as neglecting them can lead to errors. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of units and the reasoning behind using absolute values in Coulomb's law.
Physics2341313
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton is composed of three quarks: two "up" quarks, each having charge +2e/3, and one "down" quark, having charge -e/3. Suppose that the three quarks are equidistant from one another. Take the distance to be 3×10-15 m and calculate the potential energy of the subsystem of two "up" quarks. (MeV)

At first I confused the formula below with \phi(P) = \Sigma^N_{i = 1} \frac{q_i}{r_i} but this is the potential instead of potential energy at a point P with \phi=0 taken at infinity?

Homework Equations



Total electrical potential energy

U = \frac12 \Sigma_{i=1}^N \Sigma_{j \ne i}^N k \frac {q_i q_j}{ r_{i,j}}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For three charges in this arrangement I should just be able to do

U = k\frac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}} + k \frac{q_1q_3}{r_{13}} + k\frac{q_2q_3}{r_{23}}

For the total potential energy should I just not be able to do this? It says this is incorrect but I'm not seeing how given that the total potential energy is just the summation of the potential energies individually and the potential between q_2 and q_3 should be the same as the potential between q_1 and q_3 because they have the same radii and charge proportions?

U = [(8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19}))^2}{3 * 10^{-15}}] + 2[(8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19})\frac13(1.6 * 10^{-19}))}{3 * 10^{-15}}]

Then for the potential energy between both "up-quarks" I should be able to do:

U = (8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19}))^2}{3 * 10^{-15}}

Both of these are incorrect, I'm not understanding what I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it is wrong apart from the fact that you missed the sign of the down quark charge and that you are missing units?
 
I was missing the sign! That was it. I always get confused about whether to include signs or take the absolute value/magnitude. In columb's law we don't use the signs do we? Every time I've tried to use negatives in coulumbs law it came out wrong, or maybe I'm just doing it wrong. That's why I assumed the negatives were not to be included here.
 
This is something you really need to work on then. Usually you should include signs unless there is an explicit reason not to such as the thing being sought is the magnitude of the force. If you are taking absolute values on a hunch you are doing it wrong, you need to think through the reasons behind. (And you need to write out the units!)
 
MeV !
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top