Electrical Potential Energy of three quark system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrical potential energy of a subsystem of two "up" quarks within a proton, which consists of three quarks with specific charges. The initial confusion arises from mixing potential energy and electric potential formulas, leading to incorrect calculations. The correct approach involves using the total electrical potential energy formula while ensuring that the signs of the charges are accurately accounted for. A key point highlighted is the importance of including charge signs in calculations, as neglecting them can lead to errors. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of units and the reasoning behind using absolute values in Coulomb's law.
Physics2341313
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A proton is composed of three quarks: two "up" quarks, each having charge +2e/3, and one "down" quark, having charge -e/3. Suppose that the three quarks are equidistant from one another. Take the distance to be 3×10-15 m and calculate the potential energy of the subsystem of two "up" quarks. (MeV)

At first I confused the formula below with \phi(P) = \Sigma^N_{i = 1} \frac{q_i}{r_i} but this is the potential instead of potential energy at a point P with \phi=0 taken at infinity?

Homework Equations



Total electrical potential energy

U = \frac12 \Sigma_{i=1}^N \Sigma_{j \ne i}^N k \frac {q_i q_j}{ r_{i,j}}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For three charges in this arrangement I should just be able to do

U = k\frac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}} + k \frac{q_1q_3}{r_{13}} + k\frac{q_2q_3}{r_{23}}

For the total potential energy should I just not be able to do this? It says this is incorrect but I'm not seeing how given that the total potential energy is just the summation of the potential energies individually and the potential between q_2 and q_3 should be the same as the potential between q_1 and q_3 because they have the same radii and charge proportions?

U = [(8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19}))^2}{3 * 10^{-15}}] + 2[(8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19})\frac13(1.6 * 10^{-19}))}{3 * 10^{-15}}]

Then for the potential energy between both "up-quarks" I should be able to do:

U = (8.99 * 10^9) \frac{(\frac23 (1.6 * 10^{-19}))^2}{3 * 10^{-15}}

Both of these are incorrect, I'm not understanding what I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it is wrong apart from the fact that you missed the sign of the down quark charge and that you are missing units?
 
I was missing the sign! That was it. I always get confused about whether to include signs or take the absolute value/magnitude. In columb's law we don't use the signs do we? Every time I've tried to use negatives in coulumbs law it came out wrong, or maybe I'm just doing it wrong. That's why I assumed the negatives were not to be included here.
 
This is something you really need to work on then. Usually you should include signs unless there is an explicit reason not to such as the thing being sought is the magnitude of the force. If you are taking absolute values on a hunch you are doing it wrong, you need to think through the reasons behind. (And you need to write out the units!)
 
MeV !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top