Electron configuration quantum numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the quantum numbers for the electrons in a neutral carbon atom in its ground state. The user initially struggles with understanding how to fill the electron configuration correctly, particularly for the 2p subshell. Key principles such as the Aufbau principle, Pauli's Exclusion principle, and Hund's Rule are highlighted as essential for understanding electron configurations. The conversation also clarifies that the values of l correspond to subshell types, with s being l=0, p being l=1, and d being l=2, while ml values range accordingly. The user expresses confusion about these principles, particularly in the context of their quantum physics course, which focuses more on the Schrödinger equation than on these foundational rules.
Unskilled
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I need help with this problem :)

Problem: Give the quantum numbers (n, l, ml, ms) for each electron in one neutral carbonatom in ground state.


My solution: I look at a table to get the electron configuration and for a carbonatom i get 1S^2 2s^2 2p^2

For s
n=1, l=0, ml=0, ms=+-1/2
n=2, l=0, ml=0, ms=+-1/2
n=2, l=1, ml=-1,0,1, ms=??
For p
n=2, l=0, ml=0, ms=??
n=2, l=1, ml=-1,0,1, ms=??

My question: From the two first shells from s i get 4 electrons, so i have to get 2 more, but from where do i get those 2? It must be som kind of rule but i can't find any. pls help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you first two lines for the 1s ans 2s shells are correct

since you have 2p^2 and there are only 2 electrons in the p orbital we fill electrons in the spaces with ascending order of ml value with spin +1/2 electrons first and then -1/2 electrons

that is, only m=-1 and ml=0 are occupied with spin +1/2 electrons
 
Firstly, you definitely shouldn't have to look up the electronic configuration of carbon in a table. For a lanthanide, that's ok. But you need to be able to figure out the electronic configurations of the first four periods by yourself. There's only a few basic rules you need to use (Aufbau principle, Pauli's Exclusion principle, Hund's Rule of Maximum Multiplicity, stability of half and fully filled shells). Maybe you should study your textbook more thoroughly.

As for your question, it will be helpful to work digrammatically. Draw small boxes for each orbital, group them together by subshells and put each shell in its own row. Then start filling up electrons. Carbon has 6 electrons. First 2 go in 1s. Next 2 go in 2s. Next 2 go in 2p, and Hund's rule demands that they occupy two separate 2p orbitals with same spin.

For 1s2, you have (n,l,m,s) = (1,0,0,+1/2) and (1,0,0,-1/2)
For 2s2, (2,0,0,+1/2) and (2,0,0,-1/2)
For 2p2, (2,1,-1,+1/2) and (2,1,0,+1/2)

You are mistaken in your understanding of what s and p mean. They are labels to denote subshells, the value of l. Whatever the shell, s always means l=0 and p always means l=1. After that, m varies from -l to +l. Really, this is all very basic stuff that forms the foundation of chemistry. You really should read your textbook of introductory chemistry more thoroughly.

Molu
 
loom91 said:
Firstly, you definitely shouldn't have to look up the electronic configuration of carbon in a table. For a lanthanide, that's ok. But you need to be able to figure out the electronic configurations of the first four periods by yourself. There's only a few basic rules you need to use (Aufbau principle, Pauli's Exclusion principle, Hund's Rule of Maximum Multiplicity, stability of half and fully filled shells). Maybe you should study your textbook more thoroughly.

As for your question, it will be helpful to work digrammatically. Draw small boxes for each orbital, group them together by subshells and put each shell in its own row. Then start filling up electrons. Carbon has 6 electrons. First 2 go in 1s. Next 2 go in 2s. Next 2 go in 2p, and Hund's rule demands that they occupy two separate 2p orbitals with same spin.

For 1s2, you have (n,l,m,s) = (1,0,0,+1/2) and (1,0,0,-1/2)
For 2s2, (2,0,0,+1/2) and (2,0,0,-1/2)
For 2p2, (2,1,-1,+1/2) and (2,1,0,+1/2)

You are mistaken in your understanding of what s and p mean. They are labels to denote subshells, the value of l. Whatever the shell, s always means l=0 and p always means l=1. After that, m varies from -l to +l. Really, this is all very basic stuff that forms the foundation of chemistry. You really should read your textbook of introductory chemistry more thoroughly.

Molu


Thanks for the help, for this problem i think i understand how it works. But in generall I'm very confused.
The course i have is quantum physics, and my book doesn't say anything about Aufbau principle and hund's rule. We are just studing the Schrödinger equation and from that learning about quantum number and so on.
I read about hund's rule but i don't get it very well. You were talking about s gives l=0 and p gives l=1 does this mean that this continues like this and d gives l=2 and so on? and we must pick m from -1 to 1 or in the d case from -2 to 2? If so it is very good thing to remember. Which rule och princip gives this? is it hund's rule?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top