Electrostatics calculation help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the radius of an electron's orbit around a zinc nucleus, resulting in a radius of approximately 9.367E-11 m. The user applies relevant equations from electrostatics and dynamics to derive this value, confirming the calculations align with expected results. Additionally, a question arises about the effect of doubling a charge on the force, leading to confusion over the algebraic proof of this relationship. The participant seeks clarification on how changes in charge impact the overall force between two particles. The thread emphasizes understanding both the calculations and the underlying principles of electrostatics.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the radius of the orbit of an electron traveling at 9.0E6 m/s around a zinc nucleus(which contains 30 protons)?


Homework Equations


F=(kQq)/r^2
F=QE
ac=v^2/r
Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


30 protons x 1.6E-19 = 4.8E-18 C
electron - 1.6E-19 C

F=ma
F=(9.11E-31)a
a=v^2/r
F=[(9.11E-31)(9.0E6)^2]/r
F=7.38E-17/r
(7.38E-17/r)=[(9.0E9)(1.6E-19)(4.8E-18)]/r^2
r=9.367E-11 m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One more quick question:

I know how to prove that if you move a charge twice as far away, the force will be one forth.
[(kQq)/r^2]/[(kQq)/(2r)^2]
(KQq4r^2)/(kQqr^2)
=4 times as weak

But what about if you increase the charge by twice as much, shouldn't both charges end up being 3/2 times as strong?

[(kQq)/r^2]/[(2kQq)/r^2] I end up getting 1/2?
 
Qucik Question, Plz Help@@@@@

1. Homework Statement
What is the radius of the orbit of an electron traveling at 9.0E6 m/s around a zinc nucleus(which contains 30 protons)?


2. Homework Equations
F=(kQq)/r^2
F=QE
ac=v^2/r
Fnet=ma
3. The Attempt at a Solution
30 protons x 1.6E-19 = 4.8E-18 C
electron - 1.6E-19 C

F=ma
F=(9.11E-31)a
a=v^2/r
F=[(9.11E-31)(9.0E6)^2]/r
F=7.38E-17/r
(7.38E-17/r)=[(9.0E9)(1.6E-19)(4.8E-18)]/r^2
r=9.367E-11 m

One more quick question:

I know how to prove that if you move a charge twice as far away, the force will be one forth.
[(kQq)/r^2]/[(kQq)/(2r)^2]
(KQq4r^2)/(kQqr^2)
=4 times as weak

But what about if you increase the charge by twice as much, shouldn't both charges end up being 3/2 times as strong?

[(kQq)/r^2]/[(2kQq)/r^2] I end up getting 1/2?
 
Okay, I unlocked your duplicate post and merged it here into this thread. Give me a minute to try to be helpful. Oh, and do not duplicate post again, okay?
 
Last edited:
Your radius calculation looks okay. Is it not matching the solution?
 
i was just unsure on my answer and wanted to get it checked. Also, I am just unsure on how to prove algebraically how a difference in charge of one particle will effect the overall charge between the two, like I solved algebraically for the distance increase between the two.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top