Energy lost charging a capacitor - can someone check my calculations.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy lost when charging a capacitor through a resistor. The initial calculations show that not all energy supplied by the power source is stored in the capacitor, as some is dissipated as heat in the resistor. The participant attempts to derive expressions for energy delivered to both the capacitor and the resistor, ultimately finding that the energy in the capacitor approaches half of the total energy supplied as time approaches infinity. After some algebraic confusion, they realize their mistake and confirm that the energy stored in the capacitor is indeed half of the total energy supplied. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of considering limits in these calculations.
MalachiK
Messages
137
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show that not all (half) of the energy supplied by the power supply ends up in the capacitor when the capacitor is charged through a resistor. I've looked at some of the other threads on these sorts of topics and I'd thought I'd have a go at working through it myself. The treatments of this problem that I've seen seem to consider the work done moving each charge element through a potnetial differnece but I thought I could do this another way. Anyway, it's not going well and I'd appreciate any advice.

Homework Equations



I've included these in the working below...

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that you can start by considering the power transferred to C and to R over a given time interval and then integrate to get the energy transferred in this time.

At first, all of the p.d. is dropped across R. Let's call this V0. We can also call the initial current I0. None of the p.d. is dropped across the cap at first.

After time t, the p.d. across R is V0e-t/RC and the p.d. across the cap is V0(1-e-t/RC). The current is I0e-t/RC.

At ant time t, the power delivered to the resistor is V(t)I(t). So after some time T, the energy lost as heat in the resistor should be V0I0\int^T_0e-2t/RC dt

Setting Vo Io as Po and with some calculating I get...

ER=(2Po/RC)(1 - e-2T/RC)

It also occurred to me that the total energy delivered to the circuit would be \int^T_0Vo Io e-t/RC dt [the total p.d. across the circuit doesn't change, only the way it is shared out changes. The current falls with time.]Evaluating this gives me
ET = (Po/RC)(1 - e-T/RC)So far so good (unless I've made some stupid mistake!) Now for the energy to the capacitor. Following the same reasoning as before I get that...

EC= Po \int^T_0 e-t/RC - e-2t/RC dt

Evaluating this gives me

EC = (Po/RC)(2e-2T/RC -e-T/RC - 1)Now I'm doubtful of this result because it looks like it's got too many terms in it, but on the other hand, when I calculate EC = ET - ER I get the same result so at least if I'm wrong I'm internally consistent!

At this point my algebra fails me and I can't see how I can compare my expressions for each of the energies to show something like EC = 0.5 ET. Is this because there's something seriously wrong with my thinking?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\int e^{at} dt is not equal to a e^{at}


You want the energy for time from 0 to infinity, so you have to take the limit for t->inf,
wich should be easy as all the exponentials become 0.
 
For the capacitor, I get

P_c = \int_0^T I_o e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}} V_o \left(1 - e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}\right) dt

P_c = -\frac{1}{2} \tau I_o V_o \left(2 e^{-\frac{T}{\tau}} - e^{-\frac{2T}{\tau}} - 1 \right)

P_c = \frac{1}{2} \tau I_o V_o \left(1 - e^{-\frac{2T}{\tau}} + e^{-\frac{T}{\tau}} \right)

Now, τ = RC, so

P_c = \frac{1}{2} R C I_o V_o \left(1 - e^{-\frac{2T}{\tau}} + e^{-\frac{T}{\tau}} \right)

But R Io = Vo, so

P_c = \frac{1}{2} C V_o^2 \left(1 - e^{-\frac{2T}{\tau}} + e^{-\frac{T}{\tau}} \right)

In the limit as T → ∞ this becomes

P_c = \frac{1}{2} C V_o^2
 
Last edited:
Doh! I am a moron.

Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top