Engineering Math: Laplace Transform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the process of simplifying an equation using partial fractions, not Laplace transforms. Participants explain how to set the left-hand side (LHS) to A/(3s+1) + B/(3s-1) and solve for constants A and B. It is emphasized that the LHS does not need to equal zero for this method. Several resources for further explanation of partial fractions are suggested. The conversation concludes with participants expressing gratitude for the clarification.
whatphysics
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Not homework question, just need clarification and explanation. How did the person get from the left equation to the right side. I know he's just simplifying. But he didn't include steps and I've been trying to work out how to no avail. Any help on how this person simplified the LHS to RHS? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5436.JPG
    IMG_5436.JPG
    18.3 KB · Views: 446
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not a Laplace transform it is an algebraic separation of constants. I forget what they call it.

Set LHS to A/(3s+1) +B/(3s-1) then solve for A and B for values when LHS=0.
 
  • Like
Likes whatphysics
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
 
  • Like
Likes whatphysics
Merlin3189 said:
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
That's it Merlin! Thanks. The name eluded me.
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
Not a Laplace transform it is an algebraic separation of constants. I forget what they call it.

Set LHS to A/(3s+1) +B/(3s-1) then solve for A and B for values when LHS=0.
Great thanks!
 
RomegaPRogRess said:
That's it Merlin! Thanks. The name eluded me.
Merlin3189 said:
I think it is called partial fractions, as R.PR.R said (except that LHS does not need to be 0).
You can find several explanations of the technique on the web.
Great thanks!
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top