Engineering students take Aerospace engineering

AI Thread Summary
Aerospace engineering attracts fewer students compared to mechanical and electrical engineering due to its specialized nature, which limits job opportunities. Mechanical and electrical engineers have broader career prospects across various industries, making these fields more appealing. Some students consider pursuing a double major in aerospace and either mechanical or electrical engineering for a balance of specialization and versatility. The perception that aerospace engineering is more challenging may also deter students from choosing this path. Additionally, the cyclical nature of the aviation industry contributes to concerns about job stability in aerospace careers.
EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Why do only a few engineering students take Aerospace engineering where as many of those take Mechanical and Electrical engineering at the Universities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.
 
Astronuc said:
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.
I think Aerospace engineering is harder than ME and EE. This is one of the reason why many students don't take this subject. Is this right? What do you think of it?
 
Astronuc said:
Aerospace Engineering, like Nuclear Engineering, is more specialized, as opposed to Mechanical and Electrial Engineering, which are more generalized.

A mechanical or electrical engineer has opportunities at many more companies than say an Aero or Nuke engineer. On the other hand, one could do Aero and ME or EE - as in a double major. It might be worthwhile if one is really interested in Aero, but wants the diversity of ME or EE.

Your avatars are driving me crazy!. I would never think you're a nuclear engineer with "esas pintas". :smile:
 
EngTechno said:
I think Aerospace engineering is harder than ME and EE. This is one of the reason why many students don't take this subject. Is this right? What do you think of it?

Utter rubbish, at least in the UK. Aero & Mech courses are extremely similar, obviously the aeros specialise more in aeronautical systems and aerodynamics, mechs cover more materials science and manufacturing.

As far as the reason fewer students take aero, the answer has already been given, - it's a more specialised field.
 
brewnog said:
Utter rubbish, at least in the UK. Aero & Mech courses are extremely similar, obviously the aeros specialise more in aeronautical systems and aerodynamics, mechs cover more materials science and manufacturing.

As far as the reason fewer students take aero, the answer has already been given, - it's a more specialised field.


I completely agree. In addition you take into account the serious cyclical nature of the aviation business and the real possibility of picking up and moving from job to job.
 
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/

Similar threads

Back
Top